ArticleScientific reports2024
CRH-YOLO for precise and efficient detection of gastrointestinal polyps.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning driven colorectal polyp analysis: a review of detection, classification and segmentation methods.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring Real-Time Tracking of Vocal Fold Polyps in Video-Stroboscopy Using Deep Learning.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- GAD-YOLO: a gastrointestinal abnormality detection YOLO model with multi-scale channel attention and residual fusion.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Deep multimodal state-space fusion of endoscopic-radiomic and clinical data for survival prediction in colorectal cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating the detection rate and pathological features of polyps in patients with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Precision enhancement in wireless capsule endoscopy: a novel transformer-based approach for real-time video object detection.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gastrointestinal polyps are early indicators of many significant diseases within the digestive system, and timely detection of these polyps is crucial for preventing them. Although clinical gastrointestinal endoscopy and interventions help reduce the risk of malignancy, most current methods fail to adequately address the uncertainties and scale issues associated with the presence of polyps, posing a threat to patients' health. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel single-stage method for polyp detection. Specifically, by designing the CRFEM, the network's ability to perceive contextual information about polyp targets is enhanced. Additionally, the RSPPF is designed to assist the network in more meticulously completing the fusion of multi-scale polyp features. Finally, one detection head is removed from the original model to reduce a substantial number of parameters, and a high-dimensional feature compensation structure is designed to address the decline in recall rate caused by the absence of the detection head. Experiments were conducted using public datasets such as Kvasir-seg, which includes gastric and intestinal polyps. The results indicate that CRH-YOLO achieves 88.8%, 86.0%, and 90.7% on three key metrics: Precision (P), Recall (R), and mean average precision at 0.5 (map@.5), significantly outperforming current mainstream detection models like YOLOv8n. Notably, CRH-YOLO improves the map@.5 metric by 2.4% compared to YOLOv8n. Furthermore, the model demonstrates excellent performance in detecting smaller or less obvious polyps, providing an effective solution for the early detection and prediction of polyps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.