Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627305›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A semantic segmentation framework with UNet-pyramid for landslide prediction using remote sensing data.

Arush Kaushal, Ashok Kumar Gupta, Vivek Kumar Sehgal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arush KaushalJaypee University of Information Technology, Computer Science, Solan, 173234, India. arushkaushal0115@gmail.com.
Ashok Kumar GuptaJaypee University of Information Technology, Civil Engineering, Solan, 173234, India.
Vivek Kumar SehgalJaypee University of Information Technology, Computer Science, Solan, 173234, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Landslides are frequent all over the world, posing serious threats to human life, infrastructure, and economic operations, making them chronic disasters. This study proposes a novel landslide detection methodology that is automated and based on a hybrid deep learning approach. Currently, Deep Learning is constrained by the lack of applicability, lack of data, and low efficiency in landslide detection but with recent advancement in deep learning-based solutions for landslide detection has sparked considerable advantages over traditional techniques. In order to prevent and mitigate disaster, we introduced a hybrid model based on remote sensing technologies such as satellite images. Specifically, the proposed approach consists hybrid U-Net model integrated with a pyramid pooling layer for landslide detection, which uses high-resolution landslide images from the Landslide4Sense dataset. The UNet-Pyramid model has the following modifications: To improve feature acquisition and advancements to strengthen the model's attention U-Net architecture is integrated with the pyramid pooling layers and OBIA technique. The UNet-Pyramid model was trained and validated using labeled images taken from the Landslide4Sense dataset and the validated set using OBIA to improve its efficacy. The overall Precision, Recall, and F1 Score of the UNet-pyramid model for landslide detection are 91%, 84%, and 87%, respectively.

Indexed as

Deep Neural Network (DNN)Hybrid ModelLandslideLandslide PredictionMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID39627305
PMCPMC11614895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.