ArticleScientific reports2024
Perceived age estimation from facial image and demographic data in young and middle-aged South Korean adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Facial skin aging: an integrative analysis of genetics, epigenetics, and lifestyle factors.GeroScience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological age is an indicator of whether an individual is experiencing rapid, slowing, or normal aging. Perceived age is highly correlated with biological age, which reflects health appraisal and is often used as a clinical marker of aging. Perceived age has been reported as an important indicator of biological age and general health status, not only in older adult populations but also in young and middle-aged adults. However, there is a lack of objective methods for quantifying perceived age in these younger age groups. Thus, this study aimed to propose a novel perceived age estimation algorithm to meet the need for an objective method to predict perceived age. This cross-sectional study included 609 healthy men and 1388 healthy women (29.02-57.91 years, average 44.4 years) from 2017 to 2019 using data from the Korean Medicine Daejeon Citizen Cohort Study. The proposed algorithm comprised two steps. First, the initial predicted perceived age was estimated from facial images using a convolutional neural network (CNN) ensemble model. Then, the final perceived age was estimated using regression from the chronological age, sex, BMI, and initial predicted perceived age obtained in the first step. Better performance results were obtained by model averaging and model stacking generated from various basic regression models. The averaging models of Lasso, XGBoost, and CatBoost showed a mean absolute error of 2.2944, indicating that this algorithm can be used as a screening method for general health status in the population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.