Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627275›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Memory reactivation generates new, adaptive behaviours that reach beyond direct experience.

Annalise B Rawson, Sumedha Nalluru, Jill X O'Reilly, Helen C Barron

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The hippocampus as a generative model.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Awake reactivation is not a uniform process.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Annalise B Rawson *Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, FMRIB, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Sumedha Nalluru *Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, FMRIB, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Jill X O'ReillyDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Helen C BarronWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, FMRIB, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. Helen.barron@merton.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council DDT00060Medical Research Council MR/L019639/1Medical Research Council MR/W008939/1Medical Research Council MR/W01971X/1UK Research and Innovation MR/W008939/1Wellcome Trust 203139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periods of rest and sleep help us find hidden solutions to new problems and infer unobserved relationships between discrete events. However, the mechanisms that formulate these new, adaptive behavioural strategies remain unclear. One possibility is that memory reactivation during periods of rest and sleep has the capacity to generate new knowledge that extends beyond direct experience. Here, we test this hypothesis using a pre-registered study design that includes a rich behavioural paradigm in humans. We use contextual Targeted Memory Reactivation (TMR) to causally manipulate memory reactivation during awake rest. We demonstrate that TMR during rest enhances performance on associative memory tests, with improved discovery of new, non-directly trained associations, and no change observed for directly trained associations. Our findings suggest that memory reactivation during awake rest plays a critical role in extracting new, unobserved associations to support adaptive behavioural strategies such as inference.

Indexed as

MemorySleepAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleRestWakefulnessYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39627275
PMCPMC11615380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.