ArticleScientific reports2024
Exploring neural architectures for simultaneously recognizing multiple visual attributes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Much experimental evidence in neuroscience has suggested a division of higher visual processing into a ventral pathway specialized for object recognition and a dorsal pathway specialized for spatial recognition. Previous computational studies have suggested that neural networks with two segregated pathways (branches) have better performance in visual recognition tasks than neural networks with a single pathway (branch). One previously proposed possibility is that two pathways increase the learning efficiency of a network by allowing separate networks to process information about different visual attributes separately. However, most of these previous studies were limited, considering recognition of only two visual attributes, identity and location, simultaneously with a restricted number of classes in each attribute. We investigate whether it is always advantageous to use two-pathway networks when recognizing other visual attributes as well as examine whether the advantage of using two-pathway networks would be different when there are a different number of classes in each attribute. We find that it is always advantageous to use segregated pathways to process different visual attributes separately, with this advantage increasing with a greater number of classes. Thus, using a computational approach, we demonstrate that it is computationally advantageous to have separate pathways if the amount of variations of a given visual attribute is high or that attribute needs to be finely discriminated. Hence, when the size of the computer vision model is limited, designing a segregated pathway (branch) for a given visual attribute should only be used when it is computationally advantageous to do so.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.