ArticleScientific reports2024
Smart agriculture: utilizing machine learning and deep learning for drought stress identification in crops.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Deep Learning Model for Chili Pepper Fruit Shape Classification Using DenseNet-121 and CBAM.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Review
- YOLO-AVCA-CBAMNet: Attention-driven framework for detection and classification of green pepper maturity stages.MethodsX · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling of millet growth in pesticide- and vinasse-amended soils using SHAP regression interpretation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research on Drought Stress Detection in the Seedling Stage of Yunnan Large-Leaf Tea Plants Based on Biomimetic Vision and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging Technology.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Rhizosphere microbiome engineering with PGPR to combat soil-mediated climate change.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Integrating Drought Stress Signaling and Smart Breeding for Climate-Resilient Crops: Regulatory Mechanisms and Genetic Strategies.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A quantum-driven multi-stage framework integrating variational entanglement, reinforcement learning, and federated explainability for climate-resilient farming.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Detection of cotton crops diseases using customized deep learning model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Principles of environmentally sustainable agriculture for building resilient and resource-efficient food systems.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2025Review
- A comprehensive review of crop stress detection: destructive, non-destructive, and ML-based approaches.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant stress reduction research has advanced significantly with the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques, such as machine learning and deep learning. This is a significant step toward sustainable agriculture. Innovative insights into the physiological responses of plants mostly crops to drought stress have been revealed through the use of complex algorithms like gradient boosting, support vector machines (SVM), recurrent neural network (RNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM), combined with a thorough examination of the TYRKC and RBR-E3 domains in stress-associated signaling proteins across a range of crop species. Modern resources were used in this study, including the UniProt protein database for crop physiochemical properties associated with specific signaling domains and the SMART database for signaling protein domains. These insights were then applied to deep learning and machine learning techniques after careful data processing. The rigorous metric evaluations and ablation analysis that typified the study's approach highlighted the algorithms' effectiveness and dependability in recognizing and classifying stress events. Notably, the accuracy of SVM was 82%, while gradient boosting and RNN showed 96%, and 94%, respectively and LSTM obtained an astounding 97% accuracy. The study observed these successes but also highlights the ongoing obstacles to AI adoption in agriculture, emphasizing the need for creative thinking and interdisciplinary cooperation. In addition to its scholarly value, the collected data has significant implications for improving resource efficiency, directing precision agricultural methods, and supporting global food security programs. Notably, the gradient boosting and LSTM algorithm outperformed the others with an exceptional accuracy of 96% and 97%, demonstrating their potential for accurate stress categorization. This work highlights the revolutionary potential of AI to completely disrupt the agricultural industry while simultaneously advancing our understanding of plant stress responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.