Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627235›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Smart agriculture: utilizing machine learning and deep learning for drought stress identification in crops.

Tariq Ali, Saif Ur Rehman, Shamshair Ali, Khalid Mahmood, Silvia Aparicio Obregon, Rubén Calderón Iglesias, Tahir Khurshaid, Imran Ashraf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tariq AliUniversity Institute of Information Technology, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Saif Ur RehmanUniversity Institute of Information Technology, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Shamshair AliUniversity Institute of Information Technology, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Khalid MahmoodInstitute of Computing and Information Technology, Gomal University, D.I. Khan, Pakistan.
Silvia Aparicio ObregonUniversidad Europea del Atlántico., Isabel Torres 21, Santander, 39011, Spain.
Rubén Calderón IglesiasUniversidad Europea del Atlántico., Isabel Torres 21, Santander, 39011, Spain.
Tahir KhurshaidDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, 38541, Republic of Korea. tahir@ynu.ac.kr.
Imran AshrafDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, 38541, Republic of Korea. imranashraf@ynu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant stress reduction research has advanced significantly with the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques, such as machine learning and deep learning. This is a significant step toward sustainable agriculture. Innovative insights into the physiological responses of plants mostly crops to drought stress have been revealed through the use of complex algorithms like gradient boosting, support vector machines (SVM), recurrent neural network (RNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM), combined with a thorough examination of the TYRKC and RBR-E3 domains in stress-associated signaling proteins across a range of crop species. Modern resources were used in this study, including the UniProt protein database for crop physiochemical properties associated with specific signaling domains and the SMART database for signaling protein domains. These insights were then applied to deep learning and machine learning techniques after careful data processing. The rigorous metric evaluations and ablation analysis that typified the study's approach highlighted the algorithms' effectiveness and dependability in recognizing and classifying stress events. Notably, the accuracy of SVM was 82%, while gradient boosting and RNN showed 96%, and 94%, respectively and LSTM obtained an astounding 97% accuracy. The study observed these successes but also highlights the ongoing obstacles to AI adoption in agriculture, emphasizing the need for creative thinking and interdisciplinary cooperation. In addition to its scholarly value, the collected data has significant implications for improving resource efficiency, directing precision agricultural methods, and supporting global food security programs. Notably, the gradient boosting and LSTM algorithm outperformed the others with an exceptional accuracy of 96% and 97%, demonstrating their potential for accurate stress categorization. This work highlights the revolutionary potential of AI to completely disrupt the agricultural industry while simultaneously advancing our understanding of plant stress responses.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalDeep LearningDroughtsMachine LearningStress, PhysiologicalAgricultureAlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineDeep learningMachine learningPlant drought stressPlant scienceSimple modular architecture research tool (SMART)

Identifiers

PMID39627235
PMCPMC11615331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.