ArticleScientific reports2024
A new birth weight chart and optimal birth weight percentiles for predicting infant mortality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian Estimation of Marginal Quantiles with Missing Data in a Multivariate Regression Framework.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reduced oxygen tension during embryo culture and neonatal growth outcomes: a large retrospective cohort study of 13,831 fresh IVF/ICSI singleton births.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prescriptive BW charts can facilitate discrimination between normal and abnormal birthweight. This study aimed to develop a prescriptive BW chart specific to Asian populations and assess its utility in predicting infant mortality. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database and National Birth Reporting Database. This study included 2 956 475 live-born singleton infants born to healthy mothers with uncomplicated pregnancies in Taiwan from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2019. BW percentiles were estimated from GA 24-42 weeks by ranking the data in ascending order and calculating the percentile values based on the relative position of each observation within the dataset. Infant mortality rates were calculated for different GA groups, and optimal BW percentile cutoffs for predicting mortality were determined. A total of 2,255,989 infants (77.6%) from low-risk pregnancies were included in the development of the BW chart. Sex-specific BW percentiles were calculated. Optimal cutoff for predicting mortality were identified as follows: below the 22nd percentile or above the 96th percentile for extremely preterm infants (GA: 24-27 + 6 weeks), below the 11th percentile or above the 98th percentile for very preterm infants (GA: 28-31 + 6 weeks), below the 9th percentile or above the 99th percentile for moderately preterm infants (GA: 32-33 + 6 weeks), below the 8th percentile or above the 98th percentile for late preterm infants (GA: 34-36 + 6 weeks), and below the 7th percentile or above the 100th percentile for term infants (GA: > 37 weeks). A prescriptive BW chart was developed using data from a large population of Asian infants from low-risk pregnancies. BW percentiles were determined to predict infant mortality. Clinicians can utilize this approach to provide effective consultations to parents and improve decision-making processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.