ArticleBMJ open2024
Derivation and external validation of prediction model for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study in southeastern China.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of fetal cardiac morphology and function in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy using Fetal HQ technology combined with uterine artery ultrasound parameters.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to develop and validate an effective prediction model for hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP) in twin pregnancies after 28 weeks of gestation.
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingMaternity hospital.
participantsWe recruited twin pregnancies who delivered in Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital from January 2014 to December 2019 as a training cohort. Besides, we included twin pregnancies delivered at Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital; Women and Children's Hospital of Xiamen University from January 2020 to December 2021 as temporal validation set and geographical validation set, respectively.
main outcome measuresWe performed univariate analysis, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and Boruta algorithm to screen variables. Then, we used multivariate logistic regression to construct a nomogram that predicted the risk of HDP in twin pregnancies. We employed the bootstrap resampling method for internal validation, used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to evaluate the predictive performance of the model and constructed decision curve analysis to assess the clinical benefit of the model. Thereafter validated the nomogram through the index of concordance (C-index) and calibration curves in the temporal validation set and geographical validation set.
resultsMultivariate logistic regression showed that primipara (OR=1.284, 95% CI=1.016 to 1.622), the higher pre-pregnancy body mass index (OR=1.077, 95% CI=1.039 to 1.116), the higher uric acid (OR=1.004, 95% CI=1.002 to 1.005), the higher urea nitrogen (OR=1.198, 95% CI=1.087 to 1.321), the higher creatinine (OR=1.011, 95% CI=1.002 to 1.020), the higher lactate dehydrogenase (OR=1.001, 95% CI=1.000 to 1.002), the higher ratio of large platelets (OR=1.034, 95% CI=1.020 to 1.048), the lower albumin (OR=0.887, 95% CI=0.852 to 0.924), the lower calcium (OR=0.148, 95% CI=0.058 to 0.375) are influencing factors of HDP in twin pregnancies. The area under the ROC curve of the prediction model was 0.763. The C-index were 0.842 and 0.746, respectively, on the temporal validation set and geographical validation set.
conclusionsThe new model for predicting HDP in twin pregnancies constructed by clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators had high clinical application value. It can be used to individually evaluate the occurrence of HDP in twin pregnancies after 28 weeks of gestation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.