ArticleBMJ open2024
Patient-reported outcome measures in an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program: a prospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preparation of B. Braun EasypumpJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- 2026 Updated good practice recommendations for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in adults and children in the UK.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) in Italy: A Scoping Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Review
- [Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: challenges and opportunities].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Management of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy: a United States-based multi-center survey.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the improvements in the mean Short Form-36 (SF-36) score (95% CI) from predischarge to postdischarge among prospective participants of a Swiss Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) programme using Patient Reported Outcomes.
designProspective cohort study.
settingA public tertiary care hospital in Switzerland.
participantsPatients enrolled in the University Hospital Zurich's OPAT programme between October 2020 and September 2022. They were interviewed predischarge (interview 1) and 7-14 days postdischarge (interview 2) using a shortened, four-domain version of the validated SF-36) questionnaire, complemented by four additional questions gauging patient satisfaction. CO-PRIMARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes were the scores in four domains of the SF-36 questionnaire.
results33 patients participated in the study. Univariate analysis revealed substantial improvement in three of the four SF-36 domains. Specifically, participants reported improvements in the mean SF-36 score (95% CI) from interviews 1 to 2 for 'emotional role' (24.2 (5.0-43.5)), 'social functioning' (22.0 (95%CI 10.8 to 33.2)) and 'emotional well-being' (11.9 (95%CI 5.6 to 18.2)). Furthermore, 97% of patients would recommend OPAT to others.
conclusionPatients experienced significant improvements in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) while enrolled in OPAT and the programme yields high patient satisfaction. Hospitals considering new OPAT programmes should include both patient satisfaction and HRQoL impact in their argument repertoire for the introduction of OPAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.