Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627128›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Considerations of equity in the development of tools that identify and respond to end-of-life carer support needs: a scoping review protocol.

Joanna Brooks, Alex Hall, James Higgerson, Hannah Long, Sean Urwin, Christine Rowland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joanna BrooksManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK joanna.brooks@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0220-9847
Alex HallDivision of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
James HiggersonCentre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Hannah LongDivision of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sean UrwinHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9084-8368
Christine RowlandManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInformal caregivers are essential in supporting end-of-life patients at home but are often ill-prepared for the carer role. There is growing interest in the development of tools to assess caregiver support needs and a recognised need for a greater focus on addressing inequities in end-of-life care. We plan to undertake a scoping review of available literature to (1) identify and describe tools developed to assess the support needs of informal caregivers in end-of-life care; (2) report on any inequities and under-represented groups in tool development and use. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The review will conform to best practice methodological guidance (Joanna Briggs Institute) for scoping reviews. The search strategy will target published and unpublished studies using any methodology, which reports on developing or using tools or measures to assess informal carer support needs in end-of-life/palliative care settings. The following databases will be searched: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ASSIA and Proquest. Both title/abstract screening and full-text assessment will be undertaken to ensure eligibility. Searches will be conducted between May and December 2024. We will extract data relating to (1) tools/measures identified, and outcome measures used to assess these; (2) participant characteristics. Extracted data will be tabulated with accompanying narrative description to address the review objectives. Data will be extracted and write-up will be completed between January and May 2025. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review will provide an overview of the tools developed to identify and assess informal caregiver support needs in palliative and end-of-life care. The identification of any inequities will increase awareness of potentially underserved groups and contexts within the current literature, highlighting how future research and resource can be more equitably focused and implemented in a way that does not further embed disparity. Findings will be made publicly available through the Open Science Framework and disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication. As a scoping review of available literature, this work does not require ethical approval.

Indexed as

CaregiversNeeds AssessmentTerminal CareHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansPalliative CareResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicSocial SupportAdult palliative careCaregiver BurdenCaregiversReview

Identifiers

PMID39627128
PMCPMC11624752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.