Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627123›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

How to personalise cognitive-behavioural therapy for chronic primary pain using network analysis: study protocol for a single-case experimental design with multiple baselines.

Verena Eunike Hofmann, Julia Anna Glombiewski, Felicitas Kininger, Saskia Scholten

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06179784 nacompletednot on this map

Personalising Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Chronic Primary Pain Using Network Analysis - A Single Case Experimental Design Study With Multiple Baselines

TypeinterventionalSponsorProf. Dr. Julia GlombiewskiRan2023 to 2025Enrolled12ConditionsChronic Primary PainArmsCognitive Behaviour Therapy including third-wave
NCT06784141 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Network-Based vs. Standardized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Chronic Primary Pain: A Single-Case Experimental Design With Randomized Baselines

TypeinterventionalSponsorProf. Dr. Julia GlombiewskiRan2025 to 2027Enrolled75ConditionsChronic Primary PainArmspersonalized Cognitive Behavior Therapy including third-wave, standardized Cognitive Behavior Therapy including third-wave
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Verena Eunike HofmannClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau, Landau, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6706-2968
Julia Anna GlombiewskiClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau, Landau, Germany.
Felicitas KiningerClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau, Landau, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9165-1806
Saskia ScholtenClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau, Landau, Germany Saskia.scholten@rptu.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for chronic primary pain (CPP), but effect sizes are small to moderate. Process orientation, personalisation, and data-driven clinical decision-making might address the heterogeneity among persons with CPP and are thus promising pathways to enhance the effectiveness of CBT for CPP. This study protocol describes one approach to personalise CBT for CPP using network analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single-case experimental design with multiple baselines will be combined with ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Feasibility and acceptance of the study procedure will be demonstrated on a sample of n=12 adults with CPP in an outpatient clinic. In phase A, participants complete 21 days of EMA, followed by the standard diagnostic phase of routine clinical care (phase B). Person-specific, process-based networks are estimated based on EMA data. Treatment targets are selected using mean ratings, strength and out-strength centrality. After a second, randomised baseline (phase A'), participants will receive 1 out of 10 CBT interventions, selected by an algorithm matching targets to interventions, in up to 10 sessions (phase C). Finally, another EMA phase of 21 days will be completed to estimate a post-therapy network. Tau-U and Hedges' g are used to indicate individual treatment effects. Additionally, conventional pain disability measures (Pain Disability Index and the adapted Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale) are assessed prior, post, and 3 months after phase C. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical considerations were made with regard to the assessment-induced burden on the participants. This proof-of-concept study may guide future studies aiming at personalisation of CBT for CPP as it outlines methodological decisions that need to be considered step by step. The project was approved by the local ethics committee of the psychology department of University Kaiserslautern-Landau (#LEK-457). Participants gave their written informed consent prior to any data assessment and app installation. The results of the project will be published, presented at congresses, and relevant data will be made openly accessible via the Open Science Framework (OSF). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06179784.

Indexed as

Chronic PainCognitive Behavioral TherapyAdultEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementPrecision MedicineResearch DesignSingle-Case Studies as TopicChronic PainPAIN MANAGEMENTPsychosocial Intervention

Identifiers

PMID39627123
PMCPMC11624839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.