ArticleTransfusion medicine (Oxford, England)2025
Transfusing selected RhD negative patients with RhD positive packed red cell concentrates resulted in lower frequency of anti-D development and saved almost two thousand RhD negative concentrates during 5 years.
Article in Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Blood Bank at Oslo University Hospital implements restrictions when the stocks of blood groups O and A RhD negative packed red blood cell concentrates (PRBCCs) drop below 60 units due to high demand and low donor availability. Restrictions entail transfusing RhD negative male patients and women >50 years with RhD positive units, to provide RhD negative units to those who should not receive RhD positive units. Earlier studies have reported that up to 50% of RhD negative patients developed anti-D after RhD positive blood transfusion. We aimed to investigate the rate of anti-D alloimmunization using this restriction strategy in our population. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsThis retrospective study was performed at Oslo University Hospital between 2006 and 2011. Antibody screen results were included throughout 2019 for the patients readmitted to the hospital.
results607 RhD negative mostly cancer patients and patients having surgery for cardiovascular conditions received 1926 RhD positive PRBCCs. Post-transfusion antibody screen was available for 401 patients (66.1%), and 76 patients (22.2%) developed anti-D. In 15 of the 76 patients (19.7%), anti-D became evanescent in the follow-up. DISCUSSION: The proportion of anti-D immunisation in RhD negative patients receiving RhD positive PRBCCs in this study was consistent with findings from other reports. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting a high proportion of evanescence of anti-D. Transfusing selected RhD negative patients with RhD positive PRBCCs when RhD negative stocks are low, contributed saving 1926 RhD negative PRBCCs during the study period of 64 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.