Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39626875›Full record

ReviewArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2024

Dengue and severe dengue with neurological complications: a challenge for prevention and control.

Emanuelle de Oliveira Francelino, Marzia Puccioni-Sohler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emanuelle de Oliveira FrancelinoUniversidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Escola de Medicina e Cirurgia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-4524-1232
Marzia Puccioni-SohlerUniversidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Escola de Medicina e Cirurgia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6007-9142

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue is the main urban arbovirus in the Americas. The disease manifests in a varied spectrum: from asymptomatic cases to those with neurological involvement, which is considered a severe form of the disease. Its annual reemergence represents a serious public health problem. The rise in the number of cases causes an increase in the number of patients with neurological manifestations of the disease, which can range from headaches to more serious conditions such as encephalitis and Guillain-Barré syndrome, with high potential of death or sequelae. Dengue prevention and control strategies should also be a concern for neurologists. The aim of the present study is to carry out a narrative review of the current methods to prevent dengue fever and its severe forms, such as cases with neurological complications. The main control measures include vaccination, which is still carried out on a small scale, vector control, and individual protection. The CYD-TDV/Dengvaxia and TAK-003/DENVax vaccines, licensed for use by the Brazilian National Health Regulatory Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, ANVISA, in Portuguese), show efficacy against hospitalizations of 72.7% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 62.3-80.3%) and of 90.4% (95%CI: 82.6-94.7%) respectively. The TV003/TV005 vaccine, which is being studied by Intituto Butantan in Brazil, shows promising results, with an efficacy of 79.6% for symptomatic dengue. Vector control is based on biotechnological and behavioral measures, as well as on the improvement of basic sanitation conditions. The main individual protection measure is the use of topical repellents (icaridin). All of these actions represent important tools for the prevention of dengue fever and its neurological complications.

Indexed as

DengueDengue VaccinesNervous System DiseasesAnimalsBrazilHumansSevere DengueDengue Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID39626875
PMCPMC11614563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.