ArticleAntiviral research2025
Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus replicon particle vaccine is safe and elicits functional, non-neutralizing anti-nucleoprotein antibodies and T cell activation in rhesus macaques.
Article in Antiviral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Durable humoral immunity and long-term protection induced by a Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus replicon particle vaccine in mice.NPJ vaccines · 2025Article
- High binding potency overcomes the requirement of Fc effector functions for broadly reactive anti-alphavirus antibodies.Science translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancement of vaccine candidates that demonstrate protective efficacy in screening studies necessitates detailed safety and immunogenicity investigations in pre-clinical models. A non-spreading Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) viral replicon particle (VRP) vaccine was developed for single-dose administration to protect against disease. To date, several studies have supported safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the CCHF VRP in multiple highly sensitive murine models of lethal disease, but the VRP had yet to be evaluated in large animals. Here, we performed studies in non-human primates to further evaluate clinical utility of the VRP vaccine. Twelve adult male and female rhesus macaques were vaccinated intramuscularly and clinical monitoring was performed daily for 28 days. At 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days post vaccination, animals were sedated for more detailed clinical assessment; for quantification of vaccine presence in blood and mucosal samples; and for evaluation of hematology, plasma inflammatory markers, and immunogenicity. Consistent with findings in mice, vaccination was well tolerated, with no clinical alterations nor indication of vaccine spread or shedding. In addition, vaccination induced both humoral and cell-mediated responses, with immune profile and kinetics also corroborating data from small animal models. These studies provide key data in non-human primates further supporting development of the VRP for human clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.