Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39626750›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Extensive locomotor versatility across a global sample of hunter-gatherer societies.

George Brill, Marta Mirazon-Lahr, Mark Dyble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

George BrillDepartment of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6473-5995
Marta Mirazon-LahrDepartment of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5752-5770
Mark DybleDepartment of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6861-1631

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of hunter-gatherer locomotion inform a wide range of academic fields, from human behavioural ecology and hominin evolution to sports science and evolutionary health. Despite celebrated ethnographic examples of hunter-gatherer locomotor proficiency in running, climbing, swimming and diving, there has been limited systematic analysis of cross-cultural variation in hunter-gatherer locomotor versatility. We conducted a systematic cross-cultural analysis of hunter-gatherer locomotion, coding locomotor behaviour from over 900 ethnographic documents. Our results indicated that high levels of locomotor versatility are common among hunter-gatherers, and that proficiency of running, climbing, swimming and diving is found in societies across the geographical and ecological breadth of the sample. Each locomotor modality was found to be relevant not only to food acquisition but also in leisure, ritual and violent conflict. Our results also indicated the prevalence of both male and female engagement within each locomotor modality, with climbing being the only modality to possess a notable bias towards male engagement in a substantial proportion of societies. The widespread habituality and functional significance of diverse locomotor proficiency in hunter-gatherers suggests that locomotor versatility represents a dimension of human adaptive lability, playing a major role in the ability of hunter-gatherers to thrive in almost every global ecology.

Indexed as

LocomotionCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleHumansMalebiological anthropologyforagerhuman evolutionhuman locomotionhunter–gathererlocomotion

Identifiers

PMID39626750
PMCPMC11614540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.