Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39626647›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of allergy and immunology2025

Biologics Use for Psoriasis during Pregnancy and Its Related Adverse Outcomes in Pregnant Women and Newborns: Findings from WHO Pharmacovigilance Study.

Yi Deun Jeong, Hyesu Jo, Hanseul Cho, Wonwoo Jang, Jaeyu Park, Sooji Lee, Hayeon Lee, Kyeongmin Lee, Jiyeon Oh, Xuerong Wen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of allergy and immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Safety of Risankizumab during Pregnancy in IBD.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yi Deun JeongCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyesu JoCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hanseul ChoCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Wonwoo JangCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jaeyu ParkCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sooji LeeCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hayeon LeeCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyeongmin LeeCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jiyeon OhCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Xuerong WenDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA.
Lee SmithCentre for Health, Performance, and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Dong Keon YonCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe safety of biologics, other than TNF-α inhibitors, during pregnancy has not been sufficiently established. To assess the risk of pregnancy-related adverse outcomes of biologics used for psoriasis, compared to TNF-α inhibitors, we utilized the WHO global pharmacovigilance database (1968-2024).

methodsWe utilized the World Health Organization's global pharmacovigilance database from 1968 to 2024. From over 140 million reports from more than 170 countries, we extracted 6,518 reports of pregnancy-related adverse outcomes associated with the biologics of interest. These biologics included TNF-α inhibitors (e.g., etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol), IL-12/IL-23 inhibitor (e.g., ustekinumab), IL-17 inhibitors (e.g., secukinumab, brodalumab, ixekizumab, bimekizumab), and IL-23 inhibitors (e.g., guselkumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab). Each biologic was compared to TNF-α inhibitors and certolizumab pegol in two separate disproportionality analyses. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated for maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes, categorized into seven major groups. Multivariable and sensitivity analyses were conducted to validate the primary results.

resultsThe disproportionality analysis showed that, compared to TNF-α inhibitors, most biologics had a lower frequency of pregnancy-related adverse outcomes, with the exception of brodalumab. Specifically, ROR and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were as follows: ustekinumab (ROR, 0.27; 95% CI: 0.21-0.35), secukinumab (0.17; 0.13-0.22), brodalumab (0.20; 0.02-2.21), ixekizumab (0.05; 0.03-0.08), bimekizumab (0.10; 0.01-0.71), guselkumab (0.09; 0.05-0.15), tildrakizumab (0.02; 0.00-0.14), and risankizumab (0.38; 0.25-0.58). However, risankizumab was reported with a higher frequency of abortion and stillbirth (1.87; 1.32-2.63). These findings were consistent when compared to certolizumab pegol, as well as in multivariable and sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, when comparing other TNF-α inhibitors to certolizumab pegol, infliximab showed a lower frequency of pregnancy-related adverse outcomes (ROR, 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55-0.92), etanercept showed a comparable frequency (1.00; 0.77-1.31), and adalimumab showed a higher frequency (1.42; 1.11-1.81).

conclusionsBiologics used for psoriasis, with the exception of brodalumab, exhibit a lower frequency of pregnancy-related adverse outcomes compared to TNF-α inhibitors and certolizumab pegol, suggesting their potential to be safe options during pregnancy. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the safety of these biologics during pregnancy, accounting for confounding factors.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsPregnancy ComplicationsPsoriasisAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPharmacovigilancePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeWorld Health OrganizationBiological ProductsAdverse outcomesBiologicIL-12/IL-23 inhibitorIL-17 inhibitorIL-23 inhibitorPregnancyPsoriasisTumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitorVigiBaseWHO

Identifiers

PMID39626647
PMCPMC12140593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.