ReviewCurrent biology : CB2024
Building egocentric models of local space from retinal input.
Review in Current biology : CB, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ecological Visual Processing in the Mouse.Annual review of neuroscience · 2026Review
- Foveated Retinotopy Improves Classification and Localization in Convolutional Neural Networks.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Visual representations in the human brain rely on a reference frame that is in between allocentric and retinocentric coordinates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Determining the location of objects relative to ourselves is essential for interacting with the world. Neural activity in the retina is used to form a vision-independent model of the local spatial environment relative to the body. For example, when an animal navigates through a forest, it rapidly shifts its gaze to identify the position of important objects, such as a tree obstructing its path. This seemingly trivial behavior belies a sophisticated neural computation. Visual information entering the brain in a retinocentric reference frame must be transformed into an egocentric reference frame to guide motor planning and action. This, in turn, allows the animal to extract the location of the tree and plan a path around it. In this review, we explore the anatomical, physiological, and computational implementation of retinocentric-to-egocentric reference frame transformations - a research area undergoing rapid progress stimulated by an ever-expanding molecular, physiological, and computational toolbox for probing neural circuits. We begin by summarizing evidence for retinocentric and egocentric reference frames in the brains of diverse organisms, from insects to primates. Next, we cover how distance estimation contributes to creating a three-dimensional representation of local space. We then review proposed implementations of reference frame transformations across different biological and artificial neural networks. Finally, we discuss how an internal egocentric model of the environment is maintained independently of the sensory inputs from which it is derived. By comparing findings across a variety of nervous systems and behaviors, we aim to inspire new avenues for investigating the neural basis of reference frame transformation, a canonical computation critical for modeling the external environment and guiding goal-directed behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.