ArticleBlood advances2025
Development and validation of predictive models of early immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prediction models for CAR-T Cell therapy-related adverse events in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- CAR-HEMATOTOX score as a predictor of hematotoxicity, infection, and survival after CAR T-cell therapy in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Predictive Models for Toxicities after CAR T-cell Therapy: Challenges and Opportunities.Blood cancer discovery · 2026Review
- Challenges and advances in CAR-T cell therapy for B-ALL.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Infections and CAR-T cells for the treatment of lymphoid malignancies: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Can one scoring system fit all? Comparative validation of CAR-HEMATOTOX, ALL-HEMATOTOX, and eIPM for predicting immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity following CAR-T therapy in hematologic malignancies.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
- Clonal Hematopoiesis and Inflammation Predict Hematologic Toxicity and Secondary Myeloid Malignancies after B-Cell Maturation Antigen-Directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractImmune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT) is associated with morbidity and mortality after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. To date, the factors associated with ICAHT are poorly characterized, and there is no validated predictive model of ICAHT as defined by current consensus criteria. Therefore, we performed comprehensive univariate analyses to identify factors associated with severe (grade 3-4) early ICAHT (eICAHT) in 691 patients who received commercial or investigational CAR T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies. In univariate logistic regression, preinfusion factors associated with severe eICAHT included disease type (acute lymphoblastic leukemia), prelymphodepletion (pre-LD) blood counts including absolute neutrophil count (ANC), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and inflammatory (C-reactive protein [CRP], ferritin, and interleukin-6 [IL-6]) and coagulopathy biomarkers (D-dimer). Postinfusion laboratory markers associated with severe eICAHT included early and peak levels of inflammatory biomarkers (CRP, ferritin, and IL-6), coagulopathy biomarkers (D-dimer), peak cytokine release syndrome grade, and peak neurotoxicity grade. We trained (n = 483) and validated (n = 208) 2 eICAHT prediction models (eIPMs): eIPMPre including preinfusion factors only (disease type and pre-LD ANC, platelet count, LDH, and ferritin) and eIPMPost containing both preinfusion (disease type and pre-LD ANC, platelet count, and LDH) and early postinfusion (day +3 ferritin) factors. Both models generated calibrated predictions and high discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in test set, 0.87 for eIPMPre and 0.88 for eIPMPost), with higher net benefit in decision curve analysis for eIPMPost. Individualized predictions of severe eICAHT can be generated from both eIPMs using our online tool (available at https://eipm.fredhutch.org).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.