ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Clinical Diagnosis of Acute Noma: Essential Infection Markers and Clinical Presentations.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical settings, understanding the markers and clinical signs of infection is critical for timely diagnosis and treatment. However, a point-of-care diagnostic test is lacking for noma, a debilitating orofacial infectious disease. This retrospective study reviewed electronic medical records (EMRs) and paper medical records (PMRs) of noma patients from Facing Africa (235 EMRs), Yekatit 12 Hospital (68 PMRs), and Project Harar (33 PMRs) in Ethiopia to identify essential infection markers and clinical presentations of acute noma. The review identified seven acute noma patients aged 4-9 years. The patients presented with facial edema, pain, anorexia, ecchymosis, excessive salivation, and drooling, as well as specific symptoms such as visual disturbances, high fever, foul odor, halitosis, and local tenderness. Laboratory findings included elevated white blood cell counts (13,500-14,500 cells/mcL), C-reactive protein levels (107-148 mg/L), and erythrocyte sedimentation rates (65-90 mm/hour). At >85 ng/mL, procalcitonin levels were particularly high. Accurate diagnosis of noma requires a comprehensive approach that includes thorough clinical examination, appropriate disease stage classification, medical history review, and laboratory testing. The study highlights the critical infection markers and clinical presentations associated with acute noma that may aid in early diagnosis of the disease. Further research with a much larger number of participants is needed. However, given the difficulty in identifying acute noma cases due to the rapid progression and very high mortality of the disease and the challenge of accessing acute noma cases owing to various socioeconomic barriers, the results of this small study are still relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.