Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39626240›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2024

Parental Assessment of Postsurgical Pain in Infants at Home Using Artificial Intelligence-Enabled and Observer-Based Tools: Construct Validity and Clinical Utility Evaluation Study.

Fatos Sada, Paola Chivers, Sokol Cecelia, Sejdi Statovci, Kujtim Ukperaj, Jeffery Hughes, Kreshnik Hoti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Artificial intelligence in pediatric pain: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Potential applications of artificial intelligence in pain management: a scoping review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AI in pediatric surgery: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fatos SadaFaculty of Medicine, University of Prishtina, Prishtina, Kosovo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8403-4274
Paola ChiversSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2278-4857
Sokol CeceliaFaculty of Medicine, University of Prishtina, Prishtina, Kosovo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3438-3157
Sejdi StatovciUBT-Higher Education Institution, Prishtina, Kosovo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9559-3249
Kujtim UkperajClinic of Pediatric Surgery, University Clinical Center of Kosovo, Prishtina, Kosovo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7177-215X
Jeffery HughesCurtin Medical School, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0040-4753
Kreshnik HotiFaculty of Medicine, University of Prishtina, Prishtina, Kosovo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7652-6074

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain assessment in the infant population is challenging owing to their inability to verbalize and hence self-report pain. Currently, there is a paucity of data on how parents identify and manage this pain at home using standardized pain assessment tools.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore parents' assessment and intervention of pain in their infants at home following same-day surgery, using standardized pain assessment tools.

methodsThis prospective study initially recruited 109 infant boys undergoing circumcision (same-day surgery). To assess pain at home over 3 days after surgery, parents using iOS devices were assigned to use the PainChek Infant tool, which is a point-of-care artificial intelligence-enabled tool, while parents using Android devices were assigned to use the Observer-Administered Visual Analog Scale (ObsVAS) tool. Chi-square analysis compared the intervention undertaken and pain presence. Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate outcomes related to construct validity and clinical utility. Receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed pain score cutoffs in relation to the intervention used.

resultsA total of 69 parents completed postsurgery pain assessments at home and returned their pain diaries. Of these 69 parents, 24 used ObsVAS and 45 used PainChek Infant. Feeding alone and feeding with medication were the most common pain interventions. Pain presence over time reduced. In the presence of pain, an intervention was likely to be administered (χ

conclusionsThe use of standardized pain assessment instruments by parents at home to assess pain in their infants can inform their decision-making regarding pain identification and management, including determining the effectiveness of the chosen intervention. In addition to the construct validity and clinical utility of PainChek Infant and ObsVAS in this setting, feeding alone and a combination of feeding with medication use were the key pain intervention strategies used by parents.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecircumcisionclinical utilityconstruct validityinfant home assessmentinfant painObserver-Administered Visual Analog Scalepain assessmentPainChek Infantparents

Identifiers

PMID39626240
PMCPMC11653034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.