Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39626157›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2024

Multigene Copy Number Alteration Risk Score Biomarker-Based Enrichment Study Designs in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Yeonjung Jo, Jonathan J Chipman, Benjamin Haaland, Tom Greene, Manish Kohli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yeonjung JoDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0002-1630-2957
Jonathan J ChipmanDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0002-3021-2376
Benjamin HaalandPentara Corporation, Salt Lake City, UT.
Tom GreeneDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Manish KohliDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0002-9735-6614

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA composite multigene risk score derived from tumor-biology alterations specific to metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) state was evaluated as a classifier to design biomarker-based enrichment clinical trials.

methodsA plasma cell-free DNA copy number alteration risk score based on alterations in 24 genes was simulated to develop a biomarker classifier-based clinical trial design enriched for high-risk patients to detect a survival advantage of a novel treatment (hazard ratio of 0.70 with 80% power). We determined the design trade-offs between the number of patients screened and enrolled when varying the type of patients to enrich and the extent of enrichment needed.

resultsFor a 2-year overall survival end point in mCRPC state, fully enriching patients with mCRPC having a high-risk score of 3 or more (the 95th percentile of a range of risk scores in patients with mCRPC) was determined to require screening to a maximum of 4,149 patients to enroll 259 patients for the targeted effect size. A nonenriched trial was determined to require enrolling 689 patients to be equivalently powered. We identified a pragmatic alternative, which is to enrich patients with mCRPC with a risk score of 1 or more (the 67th percentile) and an enrichment fraction of 0.25. This would require screening 658 patients to enroll 584 patients, and it maximizes the ability to detect a difference in treatment effect by risk score.

conclusionA plasma multi-CNA risk score classifier can feasibly be leveraged to design an enrichment trial in mCRPC. Enriching 25% of patients screened with a risk score >1 was observed to be optimal for obtaining an adequately powered, biomarker-based mCRPC-enriched clinical trial.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDNA Copy Number VariationsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantClinical Trials as TopicHumansMaleNeoplasm MetastasisResearch DesignRisk AssessmentBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID39626157
PMCPMC11627311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.