Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39626089›Full record

Observational studyJMIR medical informatics2024

Information Mode-Dependent Success Rates of Obtaining German Medical Informatics Initiative-Compliant Broad Consent in the Emergency Department: Single-Center Prospective Observational Study.

Felix Patricius Hans, Jan Kleinekort, Melanie Boerries, Alexandra Nieters, Gerhard Kindle, Micha Rautenberg, Laura Bühler, Gerda Weiser, Michael Clemens Röttger, Carolin Neufischer and 9 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Broad consent in the emergency department: a cross sectional study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Felix Patricius HansUniversity Emergency Department, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7164-7624
Jan KleinekortUniversity Emergency Department, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3089-3850
Melanie BoerriesInstitute of Medical Bioinformatics and Systems Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3670-0602
Alexandra NietersFREEZE-Biobank, Zentrum für Biobanking, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6184-9759
Gerhard KindleFREEZE-Biobank, Zentrum für Biobanking, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0894-5327
Micha RautenbergInstitute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6666-7666
Laura BühlerUniversity Emergency Department, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4913-4774
Gerda WeiserUniversity Emergency Department, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-0209-0577
Michael Clemens RöttgerUniversity Emergency Department, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7111-8570
Carolin NeufischerUniversity Emergency Department, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-8962-2103
Matthias KühnUniversity Emergency Department, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7912-3120
Julius WehrleData Integration Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6514-4230
Anna SlagmanHealth Services Research in Emergency and Acute Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2608-0347
Antje Fischer-RosinskyHealth Services Research in Emergency and Acute Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3514-9967
Larissa EienbrökerHealth Services Research in Emergency and Acute Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-6791-1413
Frank HansesDepartment for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0007-8014
Gisbert Wilhelm TeepeUniversity Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2264-9797
Hans-Jörg BuschUniversity Emergency Department, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3897-1908
Leo BenningUniversity Emergency Department, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8429-9702

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe broad consent (BC) developed by the German Medical Informatics Initiative is a pivotal national strategy for obtaining patient consent to use routinely collected data from electronic health records, insurance companies, contact information, and biomaterials for research. Emergency departments (EDs) are ideal for enrolling diverse patient populations in research activities. Despite regulatory and ethical challenges, obtaining BC from patients in ED with varying demographic, socioeconomic, and disease characteristics presents a promising opportunity to expand the availability of ED data.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the success rate of obtaining BC through different consenting approaches in a tertiary ED and to explore factors influencing consent and dropout rates.

methodsA single-center prospective observational study was conducted in a German tertiary ED from September to December 2022. Every 30th patient was screened for eligibility. Eligible patients were informed via one of three modalities: (1) directly in the ED, (2) during their inpatient stay on the ward, or (3) via telephone after discharge. The primary outcome was the success rate of obtaining BC within 30 days of ED presentation. Secondary outcomes included analyzing potential influences on the success and dropout rates based on patient characteristics, information mode, and the interaction time required for patients to make an informed decision.

resultsOf 11,842 ED visits, 419 patients were screened for BC eligibility, with 151 meeting the inclusion criteria. Of these, 68 (45%) consented to at least 1 BC module, while 24 (15.9%) refused participation. The dropout rate was 39.1% (n=59) and was highest in the telephone-based group (57/109, 52.3%) and lowest in the ED group (1/14, 7.1%). Patients informed face-to-face during their inpatient stay following the ED treatment had the highest consent rate (23/27, 85.2%), while those approached in the ED or by telephone had consent rates of 69.2% (9/13 and 36/52). Logistic regression analysis indicated that longer interaction time significantly improved consent rates (P=.03), while female sex was associated with higher dropout rates (P=.02). Age, triage category, billing details (inpatient treatment), or diagnosis did not significantly influence the primary outcome (all P>.05).

conclusionsObtaining BC in an ED environment is feasible, enabling representative inclusion of ED populations. However, discharge from the ED and female sex negatively affected consent rates to the BC. Face-to-face interaction proved most effective, particularly for inpatients, while telephone-based approaches resulted in higher dropout rates despite comparable consent rates to direct consenting in the ED. The findings underscore the importance of tailored consent strategies and maintaining consenting staff in EDs and on the wards to enhance BC information delivery and consent processes for eligible patients.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00028753; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00028753.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalInformed ConsentAdultAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMedical InformaticsMiddle AgedProspective Studiesbiomedicalbiomedical researchbroad consentdata analysisdata sciencedelivery of health caredigital healthemergencyemergency medical servicesEuropeGermanyhealth care deliveryinformed consentinpatientsinpatient staylogistic regression analysismedical informaticsprospective observational studyroutinely collected health datasecondary data analysis

Identifiers

PMID39626089
PMCPMC11688594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.