Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39626031›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2025

The CDK12-BRCA1 signaling axis mediates dinaciclib-associated radiosensitivity through p53-mediated cellular senescence.

Natalia García Flores, Diego M Fernández-Aroca, Cristina Garnés-García, Andrés Domínguez-Calvo, Jaime Jiménez-Suárez, Sebastià Sabater, Pablo Fernández-Aroca, Ignacio Andrés, Francisco J Cimas, Guillermo de Cárcer and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. CDK12 and CDK13 in oncology: from RNA regulation to therapeutic targeting.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Natalia García FloresLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Unidad de Medicina Molecular, Instituto de Biomedicina, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1160-2330
Diego M Fernández-ArocaLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Unidad de Medicina Molecular, Instituto de Biomedicina, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2699-7374
Cristina Garnés-GarcíaLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Unidad de Medicina Molecular, Instituto de Biomedicina, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain.
Andrés Domínguez-CalvoFacultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain.
Jaime Jiménez-SuárezLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Unidad de Medicina Molecular, Instituto de Biomedicina, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain.
Sebastià SabaterServicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Spain.
Pablo Fernández-ArocaLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Unidad de Medicina Molecular, Instituto de Biomedicina, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5483-4590
Ignacio AndrésServicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Spain.
Francisco J CimasLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Unidad de Medicina Molecular, Instituto de Biomedicina, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain.
Guillermo de CárcerUnidad de Biomedicina de la UCLM, Unidad asociada al CSIC, Albacete, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3220-1785
Borja BelandiaUnidad de Biomedicina de la UCLM, Unidad asociada al CSIC, Albacete, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2448-206X
Ignacio PalmeroLaboratorio de Senescencia Celular y Supresión Tumoral, Departamento de Biología del Cáncer, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Sols-Morreale (CSIC-UAM), Madrid, Spain.
Pablo HuertasFacultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1756-4449
María José Ruiz-HidalgoLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Unidad de Medicina Molecular, Instituto de Biomedicina, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2508-8398
Ricardo Sánchez-PrietoLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Unidad de Medicina Molecular, Instituto de Biomedicina, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0882-9780

Funding

Agencia de Investigación e Innovación, Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha SBPLY/23/180225/000007Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2021-122222OB-I00Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2021-122600OB-I00Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2022-136791NB-I00European Social Fund PlusEuropean Union - Next Generation EUEuropena Regional Development FundMinisterio de Educación, Formación Profesional y DeportesRegional Government of Madrid S2022/BMD-7393Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha 2022-GRIN-34150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pan-cyclin-dependent-kinase (CDK) inhibitors are a new class of targeted therapies that can act on multiple CDKs, with dinaciclib being one of the most promising compounds. Although used as a monotherapy, an interesting approach could be to combine it with radiotherapy. Here, we show that dinaciclib increases radiosensitivity in some experimental models of lung and colon cancer (A549 or HCT 116) but not in others (H1299 or HT-29). Dinaciclib did not alter serine-protein kinase ATM signalling or cell cycle profiling after ionising-radiation exposure, which have been described for other CDK inhibitors. Interestingly, in terms of apoptosis, although the combination renders a clear increase, no potentiation of the ionising-radiation-induced apoptosis was observed. Mechanistically, inhibition of CDK12 by dinaciclib diminishes BRCA1 expression, which decreases homologous recombination (HR) and probably promotes the nonhomologous end joining repair process (NHEJ), which ultimately promotes the induction of ionising-radiation-associated cellular senescence in a TP53-dependent manner, explaining the lack of effect observed in some experimental models. In conclusion, our report proposes a molecular mechanism, based on the signalling axis CDK12-BRCA1, involved in this newly identified therapeutic effect of dinaciclib, although other players implicated in HR should not be discarded. In addition, our data provide a rationale for more selective and personalised chemo/radiotherapy treatment according to the genetic background of the tumour.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCellular SenescenceCyclin-Dependent KinasesIndolizinesPyridinium CompoundsRadiation ToleranceSignal TransductionTumor Suppressor Protein p53ApoptosisCell Line, TumorCyclic N-OxidesHumansBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCyclic N-OxidesCyclin-Dependent KinasesdinaciclibIndolizinesPyridinium CompoundsTumor Suppressor Protein p53BRCA1CDK12dinaciclibradiosensitivitysenescence

Identifiers

PMID39626031
PMCPMC11977655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.