ArticleMolecular oncology2025
The CDK12-BRCA1 signaling axis mediates dinaciclib-associated radiosensitivity through p53-mediated cellular senescence.
Article in Molecular oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-Cohort Evidence of Editome Dysregulation and Cell Growth-Related IGFBP7 Recoding Driven by ADARB1 in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- CDK12 and CDK13 in oncology: from RNA regulation to therapeutic targeting.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- An integrated network toxicology and multi-omics framework prioritizes BRCA1 as a testable candidate in benzo[a]pyrene-associated oral cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Senolytics as Modulators of Critical Signaling Pathways: a Promising Strategy to Combat Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Radiosensitization Effect of PARP Inhibitor Talazoparib Involves Decreasing Mitochondrial Membrane Potential and Induction of Cellular Senescence.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Anti-Tumor and Chemosensitizing Effects of the CDK Inhibitor Dinaciclib on CholangiocarcinomaIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pan-cyclin-dependent-kinase (CDK) inhibitors are a new class of targeted therapies that can act on multiple CDKs, with dinaciclib being one of the most promising compounds. Although used as a monotherapy, an interesting approach could be to combine it with radiotherapy. Here, we show that dinaciclib increases radiosensitivity in some experimental models of lung and colon cancer (A549 or HCT 116) but not in others (H1299 or HT-29). Dinaciclib did not alter serine-protein kinase ATM signalling or cell cycle profiling after ionising-radiation exposure, which have been described for other CDK inhibitors. Interestingly, in terms of apoptosis, although the combination renders a clear increase, no potentiation of the ionising-radiation-induced apoptosis was observed. Mechanistically, inhibition of CDK12 by dinaciclib diminishes BRCA1 expression, which decreases homologous recombination (HR) and probably promotes the nonhomologous end joining repair process (NHEJ), which ultimately promotes the induction of ionising-radiation-associated cellular senescence in a TP53-dependent manner, explaining the lack of effect observed in some experimental models. In conclusion, our report proposes a molecular mechanism, based on the signalling axis CDK12-BRCA1, involved in this newly identified therapeutic effect of dinaciclib, although other players implicated in HR should not be discarded. In addition, our data provide a rationale for more selective and personalised chemo/radiotherapy treatment according to the genetic background of the tumour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.