Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39625998›Full record

ArticleFEBS open bio2025

Using a flipped classroom teaching and learning approach to promote scientific literacy skill development and retention.

Elaina B K Brendel, Ala Alzubi, Shrujan Rai, Christine Mariathasan, Laelie A Snook, Jennifer M Monk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEBS open bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Effectiveness of Scientific Literacy and Communication E-Modules in a Molecular Biology Course: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elaina B K BrendelDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada.
Ala AlzubiDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada.
Shrujan RaiDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada.
Christine MariathasanDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada.
Laelie A SnookDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8037-4284
Jennifer M MonkDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1220-1005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of scientific literacy (SL) skills is critical in the life sciences. A flipped classroom reverses traditional learning spaces such that foundational knowledge is acquired by students independently through recorded lectures and/or readings in advance of the lecture period and knowledge is consolidated through active learning activities in the classroom. A flipped classroom learning environment can promote critical skill development and knowledge application, and therefore, could enhance SL skill development. The objectives here were to (a) determine the effect of a flipped classroom learning environment on SL skill development in second-year kinesiology students enrolled in a research methods course and (b) reassess SL skills 4 months later. SL skills were assessed using the validated test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS) questionnaire at the start and end of the semester (n = 57) and reassessed 4 months later after the summer semester break (n = 46). During the flipped classroom semester, practical SL skills (TOSLS scores) were increased by 16.3% and TOSLS scores were positively correlated with the students' final grade (r = 0.526, P < 0.001). Four months later, average TOSLS scores significantly decreased compared to the levels at the end of the flipped classroom learning experience. Importantly, retention of SL skills (i.e., 4 months later TOSLS scores) were related to learning approach scores and were positively correlated with deep learning approach scores (r = 0.298, P = 0.044) and negatively correlated with surface learning approach scores (r = -0.314, P = 0.034). Therefore, SL skill retention was higher in students utilizing a deep learning approach (e.g., engaged, self-regulation in learning, and seeking a deeper understanding of concepts) and lower in students utilizing a surface learning approach (e.g., limited engagement, rote memorization of concepts). Collectively, the results demonstrate the value of a flipped classroom in promoting SL skills while highlighting the role of students' learning approach in critical skill retention.

Indexed as

LearningLiteracyProblem-Based LearningScienceTeachingEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleStudentsSurveys and Questionnairesflipped classroomlearning approachscientific literacyskill retention

Identifiers

PMID39625998
PMCPMC11891771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.