ArticlePloS one2024
DLLabelsCT: Annotation tool using deep transfer learning to assist in creating new datasets from abdominal computed tomography scans, case study: Pancreas.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) is expanding significantly within medical research and, to some extent, in clinical practice. Deep learning (DL) applications, which use large convolutional neural networks (CNN), hold considerable potential, especially in optimizing radiological evaluations. However, training DL algorithms to clinical standards requires extensive datasets, and their processing is labor-intensive. In this study, we developed an annotation tool named DLLabelsCT that utilizes CNN models to accelerate the image analysis process. To validate DLLabelsCT, we trained a CNN model with a ResNet34 encoder and a UNet decoder to segment the pancreas on an open-access dataset and used the DL model to assist in annotating a local dataset, which was further used to refine the model. DLLabelsCT was also tested on two external testing datasets. The tool accelerates annotation by 3.4 times compared to a completely manual annotation method. Out of 3,715 CT scan slices in the testing datasets, 50% did not require editing when reviewing the segmentations made by the ResNet34-UNet model, and the mean and standard deviation of the Dice similarity coefficient was 0.82±0.24. DLLabelsCT is highly accurate and significantly saves time and resources. Furthermore, it can be easily modified to support other deep learning models for other organs, making it an efficient tool for future research involving larger datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.