ArticlePloS one2024
Free DNA partially clarifies discrepancies between qPCR and the conventional phage quantification method.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translational Quantitative Proteomic Assay for Bacteriophages: A New Frontier in Phage Pharmaceutical Development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To use phages in a personalized therapy and industrial applications, an accurate quantification is needed. The gold standard method, namely the culture-based double agar overlay (DAO) method, provides an accurate estimate of the number of infectious phages but is laborious and time-intensive. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) can be used as a fast alternative but tends to overestimate the number of infectious phage particles. Here we describe the use of a DNase treatment before quantification of the Staphylococcus aureus phage ISP with qPCR to obtain a more accurate estimate of the number of infectious phage particles. We showed that DNase treatment results in a significant decrease of the concentration when measured with qPCR although for two out of three tested ISP phage stocks, there was still a significant difference with the DAO method. We also showed that the discrepancy between quantification with qPCR and the DAO method is dependent on the storage period of the phage stock, with a larger discrepancy for older stocks. Additionally, we used negative contrast immune electron microscopy to confirm the presence of DNA in the medium of the phage stock and the impact of the DNase treatment on the free DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.