Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39625888›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Investigating the Triple Code Model in numerical cognition using stereotactic electroencephalography.

Alexander P Rockhill, Hao Tan, Christian G Lopez Ramos, Caleb Nerison, Beck Shafie, Maryam N Shahin, Adeline Fecker, Mostafa Ismail, Daniel R Cleary, Kelly L Collins and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alexander P RockhillDepartments of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Hao TanDepartments of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Christian G Lopez RamosDepartments of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5832-4046
Caleb NerisonDepartment of Family Medicine, Lexington Medical Center, West Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
Beck ShafieDepartments of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0006-3539-120X
Maryam N ShahinDepartments of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Adeline FeckerDepartments of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Mostafa IsmailDepartments of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Daniel R ClearyDepartments of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Kelly L CollinsDepartments of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Ahmed M RaslanDepartments of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8421-7105

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to conceptualize numerical quantities is an essential human trait. According to the "Triple Code Model" in numerical cognition, distinct neural substrates encode the processing of visual, auditory, and non-symbolic numerical representations. While our contemporary understanding of human number cognition has benefited greatly from advances in clinical imaging, limited studies have investigated the intracranial electrophysiological correlates of number processing. In this study, 13 subjects undergoing stereotactic electroencephalography for epilepsy participated in a number recognition task. Drawing upon postulates of the Triple Code Model, we presented subjects with numerical stimuli varying in representation type (symbolic vs. non-symbolic) and mode of stimuli delivery (visual vs. auditory). Time-frequency spectrograms were dimensionally reduced with principal component analysis and passed into a linear support vector machine classification algorithm to identify regions associated with number perception compared to inter-trial periods. Across representation formats, the highest classification accuracy was observed in the bilateral parietal lobes. Auditory (spoken and beeps) and visual (Arabic) number formats preferentially engaged the superior temporal cortices and the frontoparietal regions, respectively. The left parietal cortex was found to have the highest classification for number dots. Notably, the putamen exhibited robust classification accuracies in response to numerical stimuli. Analyses of spectral feature maps revealed that non-gamma frequency, below 30 Hz, had greater-than-chance classification value and could be potentially used to characterize format specific number representations. Taken together, our findings obtained from intracranial recordings provide further support and expand on the Triple Code Model for numerical cognition.

Indexed as

CognitionElectroencephalographyAdultBrainBrain MappingEpilepsyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStereotaxic TechniquesSupport Vector MachineYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39625888
PMCPMC11614211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.