Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39625837›Full record

ArticleAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2025

Integrating Machine Learning and Large Language Models to Advance Exploration of Electrochemical Reactions.

Zhiling Zheng, Federico Florit, Brooke Jin, Haoyang Wu, Shih-Cheng Li, Kakasaheb Y Nandiwale, Chase A Salazar, Jason G Mustakis, William H Green, Klavs F Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Transforming Molecular Synthesis With Large Language Models.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhiling ZhengDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6090-2258
Federico FloritDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6484-4953
Brooke JinDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0779-0133
Haoyang WuDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0644-7554
Shih-Cheng LiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-0034
Kakasaheb Y NandiwaleChemical Research & Development, Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Groton, CT 06340, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0754-7362
Chase A SalazarChemical Research & Development, Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Groton, CT 06340, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2221-4865
Jason G MustakisChemical Research & Development, Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Groton, CT 06340, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8683-0691
William H GreenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2603-9694
Klavs F JensenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7192-580X

Funding

Machine Learning for Pharmaceutical Discovery and Synthesis ConsortiumPfizer
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrochemical C-H oxidation reactions offer a sustainable route to functionalize hydrocarbons, yet identifying suitable substrates and optimizing synthesis remain challenging. Here, we report an integrated approach combining machine learning and large language models to streamline the exploration of electrochemical C-H oxidation reactions. Utilizing a batch rapid screening electrochemical platform, we evaluated a wide range of reactions, initially classifying substrates by their reactivity, while LLMs text-mined literature data to augment the training set. The resulting ML models for reactivity prediction achieved high accuracy (>90 %) and enabled virtual screening of a large set of commercially available molecules. To optimize reaction conditions for selected substrates, LLMs were prompted to generate code that iteratively improved yields. This human-AI collaboration proved effective, efficiently identifying high-yield conditions for 8 drug-like substances or intermediates. Notably, we benchmarked the accuracy and reliability of 12 different LLMs-including LLaMA series, Claude series, OpenAI o1, and GPT-4-on code generation and function calling related to ML based on natural language prompts given by chemists to showcase potentials for accelerating research across four diverse tasks. In addition, we collected an experimental benchmark dataset comprising 1071 reaction conditions and yields for electrochemical C-H oxidation reactions.

Indexed as

chemical reactionshydrocarbonslarge language modelsmachine learningoxidation

Identifiers

PMID39625837
PMCPMC11795713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.