Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39625756›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2024

Buprenorphine-Naloxone for Opioid Use Disorder: Reduction in Mortality and Increased Remission.

Krishna K Paul, Christian G Frey, Stanley Troung, Laura Vita Q Paglicawan, Kathryn A Cunningham, T Preston Hill, Lauren G Bothwell, Georgiy Golovko, Yeoshina Pillay, Dietrich Jehle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Krishna K PaulDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Christian G FreyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Stanley TroungDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Laura Vita Q PaglicawanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Kathryn A CunninghamDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
T Preston HillDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Lauren G BothwellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Georgiy GolovkoDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Yeoshina PillayDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Dietrich JehleDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As fentanyl has become more readily available, opioid-related morbidity and mortality in the United States has increased dramatically. Preliminary studies suggest that high-affinity, partial mu-opioid receptor agonists such as the combination product buprenorphine-naloxone may reduce mortality from overdose and promote remission. With the escalating prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD), it is essential to evaluate the effectiveness of opioid agonists like buprenorphine-naloxone. This study examines mortality and remission rates for OUD patients prescribed buprenorphine-naloxone to determine the efficacy of this treatment toward these outcomes. Methods: We carried out a retrospective analysis using the US Collaborative Network database in TriNetX, examining de-identified medical records from nearly 92 million patients across 56 healthcare organizations. The study spanned the years from January 1, 2017-May 13, 2022. Cohort 1 included OUD patients who began buprenorphine-naloxone treatment within one-year post-diagnosis, while Cohort 2, the control group, consisted of OUD patients who were not administered buprenorphine. The study measured mortality and remission rates within a year of the index event, incorporating propensity score matching for age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Results: Prior to propensity matching, we identified a total of 221,967 patients with OUD. Following exclusions, 61,656 patients treated with buprenorphine-naloxone showed 34% fewer deaths within one year of diagnosis compared to 159,061 patients who did not receive buprenorphine (2.6% vs 4.0%; relative risk [RR] 0.661; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.627-0.698; Conclusion: Buprenorphine-naloxone was associated with significantly reduced mortality and increased remission rates for patients with opioid use disorder and should be used as a primary treatment. The recognition and implementation of treatment options like buprenorphine-naloxone is vital in alleviating the impact of OUD.

Indexed as

Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationNarcotic AntagonistsOpioid-Related DisordersAdultAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineDrug OverdoseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpiate Substitution TreatmentPropensity ScoreRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID39625756
PMCPMC11610725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.