Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2024
Challenges and Approaches to Recruitment for and Retention in a Dyad-Focused eHealth Intervention During COVID-19: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03489057 (Testing the Efficacy of a Couple-Focused, Tailored mHealth Intervention for Symptom Self-Management Among Men With Prostate Cancer and Their Partners), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Testing the Efficacy of a Couple-Focused, Tailored mHealth Intervention for Symptom Self-Management Among Men With Prostate Cancer and Their Partners
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating a Tailored Web-Based eHealth Intervention for Symptom Management in Couples Managing Prostate Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Research Study Attrition and Participant-Informed Retention Strategies Among Cancer Survivors.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Dyadic Coping and Illness Uncertainty in Cancer Patient-Caregiver Dyads: Interactive Mechanisms, Heterogeneity, and Integrated Intervention Directions-A Narrative Review (2021-2025).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- ATTITUDE - Addressing attrition in longitudinal cancer cohorts: an in-depth qualitative analysis of experiences and perspectives on participation in longitudinal studies among breast cancer survivors.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Observational
- Engagement, efficacy, and experiences of psychotherapy for perinatal populations with depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFamily-based randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encounter recruitment and retention challenges. Cancer-focused RCTs typically recruit convenience samples from local cancer centers and hospitals.
objectiveThis study aimed to examine the recruitment and retention of a population-based, patient-partner dyad cohort in an RCT testing a dyadic eHealth intervention to improve the quality of life in patients with prostate cancer and their partners.
methodsIn this 2-arm, parallel-group RCT, men who recently completed treatment for localized prostate cancer statewide were recruited through North Carolina Central Cancer Registry rapid case ascertainment between April 2018 and April 2021, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient-partner dyads underwent baseline assessments and were randomly assigned to either the intervention or control groups. Follow-up surveys were conducted at 4, 8, and 12 months after baseline. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were used to achieve the study's aims.
resultsOf the 3078 patients referred from rapid case ascertainment, 2899 were screened. A total of 357 partners were approached after obtaining the eligible patients' permission, 280 dyads completed baseline assessments and were randomized (dyad enrollment rate: 85.11%, 95% CI 81.3%-88.9%), and 221 dyads completed the 12-month follow-up (retention rate: 78.93%, 95% CI 74.2%-83.7%). Regarding the factors associated with retention, compared with White participants, people self-reporting as "other races" (including American Indian, Asian, and multiracial) were more likely to drop out of the study (odds ratio 2.78, 95% CI 1.10-7.04), and older participants were less likely to withdraw (odds ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.99).
conclusionsDespite the negative impact of the pandemic, we successfully recruited enough patient-partner dyads to test our RCT hypotheses. Our recruitment and retention rates were equivalent to or higher than those in most dyadic intervention studies. A well-functioning research team and specific strategies (eg, eHealth intervention, internet phone, and online surveys) facilitated the recruitment and retention of patients with prostate cancer and their partners during the unprecedented pandemic.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03489057; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03489057. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05948-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.