ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
Machine learning in predicting cauda equina imaging outcomes- a solution to the problem.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor concerning "Machine learning in predicting cauda equina imaging outcomes- a solution to the problem" by R. Sun et al. (Eur Spine J [2025]: doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08591-1).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is a rare surgical emergency. The implications for loss of quality of life through delayed management are high, though no clinical symptom is pathognomonic in its diagnosis. We describe how machine learning based algorithms can be used in triaging patients with suspected CES (CES-S).
methodsData of 499 patients who underwent MRI scan for CES-S was collected for demographics, red flag symptoms and radiological outcome. The dataset was used to train the machine learning algorithm in predicting MRI-derived diagnosis of CES. In the testing phase output predictions and Confidence of Prediction (CoP) were recorded for each case and further analysed.
resultsOf 499 patients, 12 (2.4%) had positive radiological outcomes for CES. Patients were divided into two subgroups based on their CoP: high (< 0.9) and low (< 0.9). High CoP was observed in 482 (96.6%) cases. In this group all predictions were correct: 476 negative and 6 positives. Low CoP was observed in 17 (3.4%) cases, of which 6 predictions were incorrect - false negatives. Performing MRI scans only in cases with high CoP positive predictions and all low CoP cases would reduce scans to 5% of the original number.
conclusionWith our dataset, the trained algorithm demonstrated the potential for safely reducing the number of emergency MRI scans by over 95%. Prior to the wide clinical application, large volume prospective data is needed for continuous training of the algorithm, in order to improve accuracy and confidence of prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39625658What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.