Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39625658›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Machine learning in predicting cauda equina imaging outcomes- a solution to the problem.

Rosa Sun, Abdelmageed Abdelrahman Ramadan, Thaaqib Nazar, Ghayur Abbas, Amin Andalib, Azam Majeed, Jasmeet Dhir, Marcin Czyz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Letter to the Editor concerning "Machine learning in predicting cauda equina imaging outcomes- a solution to the problem" by R. Sun et al. (Eur Spine J [2025]: doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08591-1).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rosa SunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4979-1574
Abdelmageed Abdelrahman RamadanSwansea Bay University Health Board, Mirrston Hospital, Heol Maes Eglwys, Treforys, Swansea, SA6 6NL, UK.
Thaaqib NazarDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Coventry Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1270-0720
Ghayur AbbasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5490-6519
Amin AndalibDepartment of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6397-5273
Azam MajeedDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Jasmeet DhirDepartment of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Marcin CzyzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK. marcin.czyz@uhb.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7224-4272

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is a rare surgical emergency. The implications for loss of quality of life through delayed management are high, though no clinical symptom is pathognomonic in its diagnosis. We describe how machine learning based algorithms can be used in triaging patients with suspected CES (CES-S).

methodsData of 499 patients who underwent MRI scan for CES-S was collected for demographics, red flag symptoms and radiological outcome. The dataset was used to train the machine learning algorithm in predicting MRI-derived diagnosis of CES. In the testing phase output predictions and Confidence of Prediction (CoP) were recorded for each case and further analysed.

resultsOf 499 patients, 12 (2.4%) had positive radiological outcomes for CES. Patients were divided into two subgroups based on their CoP: high (< 0.9) and low (< 0.9). High CoP was observed in 482 (96.6%) cases. In this group all predictions were correct: 476 negative and 6 positives. Low CoP was observed in 17 (3.4%) cases, of which 6 predictions were incorrect - false negatives. Performing MRI scans only in cases with high CoP positive predictions and all low CoP cases would reduce scans to 5% of the original number.

conclusionWith our dataset, the trained algorithm demonstrated the potential for safely reducing the number of emergency MRI scans by over 95%. Prior to the wide clinical application, large volume prospective data is needed for continuous training of the algorithm, in order to improve accuracy and confidence of prediction.

Indexed as

Cauda EquinaCauda Equina SyndromeMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceCauda equinaMachine learningNeurosurgerySpinal surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.