ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2024
Hormone therapy and venous thromboembolism risk in women of menopausal age: a target trial emulation.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Contemporary data from randomized clinical trials focusing on the effect of oral hormone therapy (HT) on venous thromboembolism (VTE) in women aged 50-60 years are scarce despite evolving HT regimens. Here, we evaluated the association between HT and the risk of developing VTE using a target trial emulation among women of menopausal age. This retrospective cohort study applied a target trial emulation framework using claims data from a universal health insurance program in Taiwan. We emulated a sequence of trials in which women aged 50-60 years with no previous history of HT, hysterectomy, gynecologic disorders, or cardiovascular events were enrolled. Eligibility and HT use were evaluated monthly from 2011 to 2019. Eligible women were classified as either HT initiators or non-initiators for each consecutive month. Observational analogs of the intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects were estimated using pooled logistic regression models. Of the 150,686,148 eligible person-trials (3,001,112 women), 192,215 initiators and 768,860 propensity score-matched non-initiators were included in the analysis. The average duration of the HT was 1.25 years. Over a median follow-up of 5.83 years, 3,334 women developed VTE. The estimated hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was 0.96 (0.88, 1.04) in the intention-to-treat analysis and 0.66 (0.41, 1.05) in per-protocol analysis. The estimated intention-to-treat and per-protocol 5-year VTE-free survival differences (95% confidence interval) were 0.1‰ (- 0.3‰, 0.7‰) and 0.3‰ (- 2.8‰, 4.0‰), respectively. In the contemporary clinical setting, we did not observe an increased VTE risk associated with HT in women aged 50-60 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39625617What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.