Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39625602›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2024

How to Mitigate Risk in the Treatment of Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder.

Richard G Hersh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Richard G HershColumbia Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 25 West 81st Street, New York, NY, 10024, USA. Rh170@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewClinicians treating patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) experience concerns about risk for adverse events that can lead to litigation or complaints to administrative boards. This paper's goal is to outline steps to ensure the safety of both the patient and clinician. RECENT

findingsReview of available data confirms that psychiatry is a subspeciality with relatively low risk for malpractice litigation, but high risk for complaints to administrative agencies. Examination of litigation and complaints suggests that familiar challenges in work with patients with BPD are frequently cited. Risk management considerations have been impacted in recent years by changes in psychiatric training, health care delivery, and regulations about patient information transparency. Concurrently, empirically validated treatments for BPD have been refined and disseminated. Clinicians can address safety concerns by adapting established risk management guidance with an appreciation of key elements of BPD.

Indexed as

Borderline Personality DisorderHumansMalpracticePsychiatryRisk ManagementBorderline personality disorderEvidence-based treatmentMalpracticePolypharmacyRisk management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.