Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39625582›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025

[Clinical aspects of the preparation, performance, and follow-up of a first trimester abortion].

Matthias David

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Matthias DavidCampus Virchow-Klinikum, Klinik für Gynäkologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland. matthias.david@charite.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In January 2023, the "S2k guideline on abortion in the first trimester" of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies ("Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V.", AWMF) was published, which was commissioned by the Federal Ministry of Health ("Bundesministerium für Gesundheit", BMG). The guideline deals with surgical and medical abortion after counseling, with criminological or medical indication in the first 14 weeks of pregnancy, based to the last menstrual period. In this review article, based on this guideline, the procedures for medical and surgical abortion are compared as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. Clinical and practical aspects of preparation and implementation, complication management, and immediate aftercare for abortion are presented.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancy Trimester, FirstAftercareFemaleGermanyHumansPregnancyAbortionFirst trimesterMedical abortionPreoperative measuresSurgical abortion

Identifiers

PMID39625582
PMCPMC11732934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.