SynthesisCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2025
Safety of crushed/chewed P2Y12 inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standard and Non-standard Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Ischemic Heart Disease and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Clinical Review.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Review
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Acute Cardiovascular Care.Circulation reports · 2025Review
- Antithrombotic Management in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Clinical Review.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The administration of crushed or chewed P2Y12 inhibitors (P2Y12i) allows faster platelet inhibition in patients presenting acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Whether this administration approach is safe needs further analysis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chewed/crushed to integral P2Y12i administration in patients with ACS. Major bleeding, minor bleeding, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were analyzed as binary outcomes. Platelet reactivity unit (PRU) was assessed as a continuous outcome to estimate the impact on platelet physiology. A subgroup analysis of P2Y12i administered was performed. Nine studies comprising 1091 patients with ACS were included, 77% were males. Overall, 87% presented with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Six studies administered Ticagrelor, while 3 studies used Prasugrel. The absolute risk of bleeding, assessed by TIMI, was low in both intervention and control arms (0.36% vs. 0.95% for major bleedings and 3.3% vs. 4.4% for minor bleedings), and crushed/chewed administration did not increase the relative risk of bleeding events for TIMI major or minor bleedings (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.09-2.77, p = 0.293; RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.24-2.43, p = 0.542) or MACE (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.28-3.19, p = 0.902). PRU was significantly reduced within 1 h after administration in the crushed/chewed P2Y12i group (MD: -70.0%, 95% CI, -89.0 to -51.1%, p<0.01) while we did not observe a significant difference after 4 h (MD: -15.1%, 95% CI -34.2 to 4.0%, p = 0.12). The type of drug did not influence the relative risk of crushed/chewed P2Y12i on major or minor bleeding (p
Indexed as
Identifiers
39625567What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.