Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39625544›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2025

Use of surface tracking recordings to identify pitfalls during surface-guided radiotherapy.

G Klumpp, S Baumbach, N Wegner, P Freislederer, L Wagner, K P Aninditha, T Ellethy, M Münter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

G KlumppKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. georg_klumpp@yahoo.de.ORCID 0009-0009-4361-8947
S BaumbachKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
N WegnerAbteilung für Medizinische Physik und Strahlenschutz, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
P FreisledererBrainlab AG, Munich, Germany.
L WagnerBrainlab AG, Munich, Germany.
K P AnindithaKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
T EllethyKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
M MünterKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe precise daily positioning of patients during radiation therapy determines the quality of the entire treatment. To avoid additional radiation exposure from regular cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans, surface-guided radiotherapy systems (SGRT) are increasingly used. The aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the advantages, feasibility, and pitfalls of SGRT using the surface tracking recorder prototype of the camera component of ExacTrac Dynamic (Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany). This system combines both surface-based imaging technology and a thermographic camera that records patients via thermal imaging to accurately measure patient geometry.

methodsThe surfaces of patients with various tumor entities and therefore different regions of interest (ROIs) were recorded with the surface camera during positioning and throughout treatment. Subsequently, these surface camera datasets were analyzed to compare the accuracy of patient positioning with the current treatment standard (X-ray-based IGRT). The camera components were used only as an imaging tool and not to correct any deviations. For evaluation of typical pitfalls, errors > 5 mm for extracranial indications and > 2 mm for cranial indications were analyzed using parameters extracted from the surface recordings and the corresponding CBCT shifts.

resultsIn total, 162 displacement vector datasets for 130 patients were generated and evaluated. The smallest deviations were found in the head and neck regions (mean deviation 1.9 mm/0.8°). The largest mean translational deviation (4.8 mm) and mean rotational deviation (1.1°) were found in the pelvic area. In all regions, most datasets showed clinically acceptable deviations; however, large outliers were observed in some measurements, particularly longitudinally. These outliers are of special interest because they may indicate mistakes in the use of SGRT, and they were therefore analyzed separately in detail. Several reasons for the outliers were identified, and potential solutions to avoid these pitfalls are presented.

conclusionThis observational study demonstrated the advantages and pitfalls of SGRT by using the surface tracking recorder prototype of the camera component of ExacTrac Dynamic. These pitfalls can be avoided through thorough application of SGRT. This study may serve as a practical guide for clinicians already using or introducing SGRT for patient positioning.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyNeoplasmsPatient PositioningRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRadiotherapy Setup ErrorsExac trac dynamicImage guided radiotherapyPatient positioningPrototypeRegion of interest

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.