ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024
Clinical application of mobile CT combined with procedural sedation and analgesia in the preoperative localization of multiple pulmonary nodules.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of mobile CT combined with procedural sedation and analgesia for the preoperative localization of multiple nodules.
methodsThe clinical data of 200 patients who underwent CT-guided localization before single-port thoracoscopic pulmonary lobe surgery at our hospital from July 2023 to September 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the localization method: Group A consisted of 100 patients who were localized under local anesthesia, and Group B consisted of 100 patients who were localized under procedural sedation and analgesia combined with local anesthesia. The general clinical data and localization data of the two groups were compared and analyzed.
resultsThe incidence of localization complications in Group B was significantly lower than that in Group A (4% vs. 13%, P = 0.04). The localization success rate in Group B was significantly greater than that in Group A (98% vs. 92%, P = 0.04). The localization time in Group B was significantly shorter than that in Group A (15.23 ± 5.96 min vs. 19.90 ± 8.66 min, P<0.01), and the pain score in Group B was significantly lower than that in Group A (2.01 ± 2.09 min vs. 3.29 ± 2.54 min, P<0.01).
conclusionMobile CT combined with procedural sedation and analgesia for preoperative puncture localization of multiple pulmonary nodules is safe and effective, with significant clinical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39625519What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.