Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39625513›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Prognostic Nutritional Index is a valuable preoperative prognostic biomarker in Mexican patients surgically intervened on gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort study.

Roberto Herrera-Goepfert, Giovanny Soca-Chafre, Luis F Oñate-Ocaña, Angélica Montiel-Dávalos, Emma Rodríguez-Maldonado, Elvira Castro-Martínez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roberto Herrera-GoepfertDepartment of Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando 22, Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Ciudad de México, Mexico. rhgoepfert@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7901-2378
Giovanny Soca-ChafreOncological Diseases Research Unit (UIEO), Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez (HIMFG), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3985-9149
Luis F Oñate-OcañaClinical Research Division, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2020-0283
Angélica Montiel-DávalosBasic Research Division, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8617-5981
Emma Rodríguez-MaldonadoLaboratory of Translational Cardiology, Research Unit UNAM-INC, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5509-5321
Elvira Castro-MartínezEmergency Department, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía "Dr. Manuel Velasco Suárez", Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7041-1831

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe immunonutritional status of cancer patients has a profound impact on lifespan. Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) evaluates prognosis in operated patients with both neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions. This study estimates the overall survival (OS) of Mexican patients operated on gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) based on PNI.

methodsImmune-nutritional status was retrospectively analyzed in a cohort of 104 patients operated on GIST. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and X-tile software were used to estimate the optimal cutoff point and predict OS stratifying patients by PNI. Survival curves were obtained through Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. Multivariate analysis of survival was performed by Cox regression.

resultsPNI (≥ 36.5) (p = 0.024) and mitotic index (≥ 5) (p = 0.013) were the only independent prognostic scores; the PNI-high group had better survival with 81.5% less risk of death (HR = 0.185). High PNI was correlated with favorable characteristics, i.e., low/intermediate risk (p = 0.046), reduced mitotic index (< 5) (p = 0.001), and younger age (< 55 years, p = 0.047).

conclusionsPNI ≥ 36.5 entails a better prognosis for Mexican patients with surgically resected GIST. PNI represents a simple, reliable, and cost-effective prognostic tool, besides the pathological approach.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMexicoMiddle AgedMitotic IndexMultivariate AnalysisGastrointestinal stromal tumorImmune statusInflammatory statusMexican patientsPrognostic Nutritional Index

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.