ArticleJournal of vision2024
Impaired processing of spatiotemporal visual attention engagement deficits in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia.
Article in Journal of vision, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging evidence suggests that visuospatial attention plays an important role in reading among Chinese children with dyslexia. Additionally, numerous studies have shown that Chinese children with dyslexia have deficits in their visuospatial attention orienting; however, the visual attention engagement deficits in Chinese children with dyslexia remain unclear. Therefore, we used a visual attention masking (AM) paradigm to characterize the spatiotemporal distribution of visual attention engagement in Chinese children with dyslexia. AM refers to impaired identification of the first (S1) of two rapidly sequentially presented mask objects. In the present study, S1 was always centrally displayed, whereas the spatial position of S2 (left, middle, or right) and the S1-S2 interval were manipulated. The results revealed a specific temporal deficit of visual attentional masking in Chinese children with dyslexia. The mean accuracy rate for developmental dyslexia (DD) in the middle spatial position was significantly lower than that in the left spatial position at a stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of 140 ms, compared with chronological age (CA). Moreover, we further observed spatial deficits of visual attentional masking in the three different spatial positions. Specifically, in the middle spatial position, the AM effect of DD was significantly larger for the 140-ms SOA than for the 250-ms and 600-ms SOA compared with CA. Our results suggest that Chinese children with dyslexia are significantly impaired in visual attentional engagement and that spatiotemporal visual attentional engagement may play a special role in Chinese reading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.