Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39625350›Full record

Trial reportOral health & preventive dentistry2024

Efficacy of Probiotic Tablets in the Reduction of Halitosis: A Randomised, Single Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Guixia Huang, Nan Li

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Guixia Huang
Nan Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effect of a fresh-breath mild effervescent tablet on halitosis as an alternative to mouthwash. MATERIALS AND

methodsHalitosis is the unpleasant and offensive odour emanating from the oral cavity (bad breath), which is linked to the presence of volatile sulphur compounds (VSCs). A randomised, single-blind, controlled clinical trial was conducted with 102 volunteers who had oral complaints (range 18-60 years). Breath samples were taken and analysed for the level of hydrogen sulphide (H2S), methyl mercaptan (CH3SH) and dimethyl sulphide (CH3SCH3). Sixty-one volunteers who met the halitosis criteria were enrolled and completed the clinical trial. Two groups were formed according to the test employed: the Immediate Effect Test (IET) (n = 31) and the Effective Duration Test (EDT) (n = 30). In the IET, subjects were divided into three subgroups: fresh-breath mild effervescent tablet (MT, n = 11), the fresh-breath lozenge tablet (LT, n = 10), and fresh-breath mouthwash (MW, n = 10). Halitosis was measured immediately after completely consuming the test tablet or gargling. In the EDT, subjects were also divided into three subgroups: fresh-breath mild effervescent tablet (MT, n = 10), probiotic powder (PP, n = 10) and probiotic tablet (PT, n = 10). Halitosis was measured at 0 h, 1 h, and 2 h after consuming the test substances.

resultsIn the IET group, a statistically significant reduction in VSCs was obtained in all three subgroups compared with baseline (VSCs of MT group, p 0.01, VSCs of LT subgroup, p 0.05, VSCs of MT group, p 0.01). The fresh-breath mild effervescent tablet subgroup showed a statistically significantly greater reduction in VSCs compared to the fresh-breath lozenge subgroup (p 0.01). No statistically significant differences in VSC reduction were found between the fresh-breath mild effervescent tablet subgroup and the mouthwash group (p = 0.38). In the EDT group, the VSC level of the fresh-breath mild effervescent tablet group was still statistically significantly lower than the baseline 2 h after consumption (p 0.01). The two control groups which used commercial fresh-breath probiotic products did not show any statistically significant difference compared to baseline. The VSC level of these two groups gradually returned to the baseline level 2 h after consumption.

conclusionFresh-breath mild effervescent tablets have shown promising potential as an alternative, effective, and potentially safe choice for fresh breath in comparison to mouthwash.

Indexed as

HalitosisProbioticsSulfhydryl CompoundsAdolescentAdultBreath TestsFemaleHumansHydrogen SulfideMaleMiddle AgedMouthwashesSingle-Blind MethodSulfidesSulfur CompoundsTabletsdimethyl sulfideHydrogen SulfidemethylmercaptanMouthwashesSulfhydryl CompoundsSulfidesSulfur CompoundsTabletsfresh breathhalitosisnatural extractsprobioticvolatile sulphur compounds (VSCs)

Identifiers

PMID39625350
PMCPMC12094102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.