Trial reportOral health & preventive dentistry2024
Efficacy of Probiotic Tablets in the Reduction of Halitosis: A Randomised, Single Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of an Essential Oil Mouthwash on Halitosis in Obese Patients with Periodontitis: A Short-Term Clinical Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the effect of a fresh-breath mild effervescent tablet on halitosis as an alternative to mouthwash. MATERIALS AND
methodsHalitosis is the unpleasant and offensive odour emanating from the oral cavity (bad breath), which is linked to the presence of volatile sulphur compounds (VSCs). A randomised, single-blind, controlled clinical trial was conducted with 102 volunteers who had oral complaints (range 18-60 years). Breath samples were taken and analysed for the level of hydrogen sulphide (H2S), methyl mercaptan (CH3SH) and dimethyl sulphide (CH3SCH3). Sixty-one volunteers who met the halitosis criteria were enrolled and completed the clinical trial. Two groups were formed according to the test employed: the Immediate Effect Test (IET) (n = 31) and the Effective Duration Test (EDT) (n = 30). In the IET, subjects were divided into three subgroups: fresh-breath mild effervescent tablet (MT, n = 11), the fresh-breath lozenge tablet (LT, n = 10), and fresh-breath mouthwash (MW, n = 10). Halitosis was measured immediately after completely consuming the test tablet or gargling. In the EDT, subjects were also divided into three subgroups: fresh-breath mild effervescent tablet (MT, n = 10), probiotic powder (PP, n = 10) and probiotic tablet (PT, n = 10). Halitosis was measured at 0 h, 1 h, and 2 h after consuming the test substances.
resultsIn the IET group, a statistically significant reduction in VSCs was obtained in all three subgroups compared with baseline (VSCs of MT group, p 0.01, VSCs of LT subgroup, p 0.05, VSCs of MT group, p 0.01). The fresh-breath mild effervescent tablet subgroup showed a statistically significantly greater reduction in VSCs compared to the fresh-breath lozenge subgroup (p 0.01). No statistically significant differences in VSC reduction were found between the fresh-breath mild effervescent tablet subgroup and the mouthwash group (p = 0.38). In the EDT group, the VSC level of the fresh-breath mild effervescent tablet group was still statistically significantly lower than the baseline 2 h after consumption (p 0.01). The two control groups which used commercial fresh-breath probiotic products did not show any statistically significant difference compared to baseline. The VSC level of these two groups gradually returned to the baseline level 2 h after consumption.
conclusionFresh-breath mild effervescent tablets have shown promising potential as an alternative, effective, and potentially safe choice for fresh breath in comparison to mouthwash.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.