ArticleJournal of inherited metabolic disease2025
Mapping challenges in the accessibility of treatment products for urea cycle disorders: A survey of European healthcare professionals.
Article in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Essential Oral Single Nutritional Therapy Products for Inherited Metabolic Diseases: Evidence and Consensus Assessment Using a Modified Delphi Method.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Article
- Pre-emptive treatment in later-onset urea cycle disorders: a clinical perspective on glycerol phenylbutyrate.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Review
- Article
- Mapping challenges in the accessibility of treatment products for urea cycle disorders: A survey of European healthcare professionals.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current management guidelines for urea cycle disorders (UCDs) offer clear strategies, incorporating both authorized and non-authorized medicinal products (including intravenous formulations and products regulated as food). These varying product categories are subject to specific accessibility challenges related to availability, reimbursement, and pricing. The aim of this study is to identify potential obstacles to optimal UCD treatment implementation in European clinical practice. A survey aimed at metabolic healthcare professionals (HCPs) managing patients with UCDs in Europe was disseminated through the European Reference Network for Hereditary Metabolic Disorders and the European registry and network for intoxication type metabolic diseases. Forty-eight survey responses were collected from 21 European countries. In 16 of these countries, at least one metabolic HCP reported challenges in accessing UCD products. Reimbursement issues were reported for most products (8/10), including both authorized and non-authorized products. Availability-related challenges were also reported for 8/10 products, although unavailability was limited to non-authorized products. Prices impacted accessibility for all authorized products (3/3) and one non-authorized IV product. The accessibility of UCD treatment products varied across Europe, although no clear regional variations could be discerned. Survey data revealed that metabolic HCPs experience challenges in accessing both authorized and non-authorized products for UCD management in the majority of European countries. This indicates that registering unauthorized products may not resolve all issues. Improved reimbursement policies and fair pricing models, as well as (adjusted) authorization procedures may help address these concerns, thereby optimizing treatment access for UCD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.