Trial reportArtificial organs2025
Curricular Self-management for patients on ventricular assist device support decreases depression: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Artificial organs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Curricular Self-management for patients on ventricular assist device support decreases depression: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.Artificial organs · 2025Trial
- Self and Dyadic Management of Patients and Care Partners Living with Durable Ventricular Assist Device: Emerging Science, Studies, and Frameworks to Advance Precision Health.Current heart failure reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUtilization of ventricular assist device (VAD) support in patients with end-stage heart failure is well advanced. Recent studies emphasize the need to develop and evaluate evidence-based psychosocial support interventions for patients following VAD implantation.
methodsA national, multi-center study in four established German heart centers was initiated. An evidence-based VAD curriculum was developed; a randomized controlled trial evaluated the impact of the interprofessional intervention over time. Primary combined endpoint was the occurrence of adverse events (thromboembolic events, driveline infections, bleeding, rehospitalization, and death); secondary endpoints were psychosocial outcomes (anxiety, depression [HADS], quality of life [QoLVAD], social support [FSoZu], and self-management [SELMA]). A total of 140 patients were randomized block-wise to intervention (IG n = 70) or control (CG n = 70). Center-effects were considered. Instruments were completed at four time points (T0-T3).
resultsAt baseline, intervention group (IG) patients were 19% female (control group [CG] 19%; p = 0.982); 58 ± 11 years. (CG 58 ± 11 years.; p = 0.966); 80% were implanted electively (CG 79%; p = 0.968). No significant difference in primary endpoint was found between IG versus CG (p > 0.05). For secondary endpoints, mixed linear regression revealed a significant reduction in depression scores in IG compared to CG (est. 1.18; 95% CI -2.17 to -0.18; p = 0.021). Clinically significant reductions in anxiety were greater in IG patients between T0 and T3 (IG 51.9%; CG 40.7%); increased anxiety was reported in 3.7% IG (11.1% CG). Mixed linear regression analyses favored IG (all >0.05) for QoL, social support, and self-management.
conclusionA comprehensive curricular VAD intervention has potential to decrease depression levels and improve psychosocial outcomes of patients on VAD support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.