Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39625090›Full record

ArticleCurationis2024

Exploring sociocultural factors and ubuntuism for women living with HIV in rural Zimbabwe.

Limkile Mpofu, Idah Moyo, Azwihangwisi H Mavhandu-Mudzusi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Curationis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Limkile MpofuDepartment of Health Studies, College of Human Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa; and Research Division, Jaylee Group, Pretoria. leempofu@gmail.com.
Idah Moyo
Azwihangwisi H Mavhandu-Mudzusi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe focus of this study was on women living with HIV in rural Zimbabwe, who face many challenges, both in the family and community. Patriarchy compounds these problems as these women navigate access to health and other services.

objectivesThe study sought to explore ubuntuism and the sociocultural factors that facilitate or constrain women living with HIV from accessing community services and resources.

methodAn interpretive phenomenological analysis research design was utilised for the study. Purposive and quota sampling were applied to recruit 40 participants from six villages. Data were collected using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions that were audio recorded and transcribed. The data were analysed using the interpretive phenomenological analysis framework.

resultsThe study found that women living with HIV face stigma and discrimination in the form of social exclusion and reduced access to community-based health activities and empowerment opportunities. These challenges were compounded by the negative impact of patriarchy that gives rise to land, resettlement and acculturation challenges.

conclusionUbuntu is a reflection of mutual dependence and can be used to promote more compassionate relationships with those who are HIV positive in the community.Contribution: The study provides unique insights into the challenges experienced by women living with HIV and how ubuntu could mitigate those challenges so that it adds to the humanistic philosophies in interpersonal relationships.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsHIV InfectionsQualitative ResearchRural PopulationSocial StigmaAdultFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedZimbabweHIV-positive rural womeninterpretive phenomenological analysispatriarchysociocultural factorsstigma and discriminationubuntu

Identifiers

PMID39625090
PMCPMC11621919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.