ArticleCancer medicine2024
Hospital Quality and Racial Differences in Outcomes After Genitourinary Cancer Surgery.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality in Surgery: Concepts, Measurement, Advances and Strategies for Improvement.World journal of surgery · 2026Review
- Non-Caucasian Race/Ethnicity Predisposes to Unfavorable Stage and Grade at Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Diagnosis.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Association of race and 30-day postoperative complications after urologic oncology surgery.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
objectivesPrior work has demonstrated racial disparities in surgical outcomes for solid organ cancers. We sought to assess the relationship between hospital quality and racial disparities in achievement of textbook outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for prostate, kidney, and bladder cancer.
methodsWe used 100% national Medicare Provider Analysis and Review files from 2017 to 2020 to assess textbook outcomes in Patients undergoing bladder (i.e., radical cystectomy), kidney (i.e., radical or partial nephrectomy), and prostate (i.e., radical prostatectomy) surgery for genitourinary malignancies. Our exposure was hospital-level quality, assessed by the predicted to expected ratio of achievement of textbook outcomes, agnostic to social and economic determinants of health. Our main outcome was achievement of textbook outcomes in White and Black patients. We defined the textbook outcome as the absence of in-hospital mortality, mortality within 30 days of surgery, readmission within 30 days of discharge, a postoperative complication, and prolonged length of stay. The secondary outcome was percentage of Black and White patients treated at the highest quality hospitals.
resultsAs hospital quality increased, disparities in the receipt of textbook outcome for White and Black patients narrowed. For every 0.1 increment increase in the predicted to expected ratio of hospital quality, Black-White disparities in the odds of achieving textbook outcomes decreased by 5.7% (interaction OR: 1.06; 95% CI 1.01-1.11 p = 0.026). Black patients were less likely to be treated at the highest quality hospitals compared to White patients (45.2% vs. 49.5% p = < 0.001%).
conclusionsCompared to White patients, Black patients had lower odds of textbook outcomes after surgery for prostate, kidney, and bladder cancer. The racial differences in achieving textbook outcomes were narrowed as hospital quality increased. Black patients were less likely than White patients to be treated at the highest-quality hospitals. Our findings underscore the importance of improved access to high quality care among Black patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.