ArticleCancer science2025
Smoking-independent DNA methylation markers for lung cancer risk: External validation in a large population-based cohort study.
Article in Cancer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements and Clinical Applications Prospects of Epigenetic Biomarkers in Liquid Biopsy for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Lung cancer in non-smoking women (LCINSW): from risk factors to precision therapy.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Review
- Smoking-independent DNA methylation markers for lung cancer risk: External validation in a large population-based cohort study.Cancer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Smoking-associated epigenetic changes have been linked to lung cancer (LC) risk; however, the role of epigenetic alterations independent of smoking is yet to be fully understood. This study aimed to validate 16 previously reported CpG sites that are independent of smoking yet associated with LC risk within a population-based prospective cohort. Using the Infinium Methylation EPIC BeadChip kit or the Infinium HumanMethylation450K BeadChip Assay, DNA methylation (DNAm) in whole blood was assessed in four subsets (n = 736, 1027, 997, and 312) of a population-based cohort from Germany. The DNAm levels of the 16 smoking-independent CpG sites were analyzed. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to assess associations of DNAm at the 16 CpG sites with LC risk, adjusting for multiple covariates, including smoking habits and a smoking-associated DNAm score. Over 17 years of follow-up, a total of 199 LCs were observed. Among the 16 CpGs, cg02211449 showed a negative association with LC risk (HR [95% CI] per SD increase, = 0.70 [0.63-0.78]), while cg11385536 (1.04 [1.01-1.07]), cg09736286 (1.64 [1.10-2.44]), cg19907023 (1.64 [1.01-2.66]), and cg22032485 (1.52 [1.04-2.21]) displayed positive associations with LC risk. Five of the 16 suggested smoking-independent CpGs could be externally validated as predictors of LC risk. Further research should address their potential contribution to enhanced LC risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.