Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39624847›Full record

SynthesisJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2025

Systematic Review of 3D-Printed Ultrasound-able Models in Graduate Medical Education.

Joshua D Krech, Taylor Wyatt, Derek J Harmon

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joshua D KrechDepartment of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0830-4027
Taylor WyattDepartment of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Derek J HarmonDepartment of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3958-9468

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to identify studies that have created ultrasound-able models for resident procedural training by means of 3D-printing techniques and examine their tissue specific properties. There were 456 articles identified from 3 databases, of which, 35 studies were assessed for eligibility, and 11 total studies were included. All qualitative studies showed improvements in procedural skills and 89% of the quantitative studies showed significant results. Studies that documented modeling price showed a 90% reduction in fabrication cost compared to commercial models. Three-dimensional-printed, ultrasound-able models have the potential to provide trainees with low-cost, high-fidelity training opportunities.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateModels, AnatomicPrinting, Three-DimensionalClinical CompetenceHumansInternship and ResidencyUltrasonography3D printinganthropomorphic phantomgraduate medical educationsimulation‐based medical educationultrasound

Identifiers

PMID39624847
PMCPMC11892083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.