Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39624736›Full record

ArticleSkin health and disease2024

A prospective, double-blinded, randomized head-to-head clinical trial of topical adapinoid (oleyl adapalenate) versus retinol.

Nhi Nguyen, Nasima Afzal, Mildred Min, Nabeel Ahmad, Laila Afzal, Waqas Burney, Cindy J Chambers, Raja K Sivamani

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin health and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05778760 (Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Head-to-Head Study of Topical Adapinoid Versus Topical Retinol), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05778760 nacompletednot on this map

Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Head-to-Head Study of Topical Adapinoid Versus Topical Retinol

TypeinterventionalSponsorIntegrative Skin Science and ResearchRan2023 to 2023Enrolled48ConditionsWrinkleArmsRetinol, Adapinoid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nhi NguyenIntegrative Skin Science and Research Sacramento California USA.
Nasima AfzalIntegrative Skin Science and Research Sacramento California USA.
Mildred MinIntegrative Skin Science and Research Sacramento California USA.
Nabeel AhmadIntegrative Skin Science and Research Sacramento California USA.
Laila AfzalIntegrative Skin Science and Research Sacramento California USA.
Waqas BurneyIntegrative Skin Science and Research Sacramento California USA.
Cindy J ChambersIntegrative Skin Science and Research Sacramento California USA.
Raja K SivamaniIntegrative Skin Science and Research Sacramento California USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Retinoids, such as retinol, are widely investigated and utilized in skin care products as a treatment for photoaging but their use is limited by tolerability. Adapinoid (oleyl adapalenate, OA) is a novel third generation retinoid that is a pro-drug of adapalene, but there is little research on its effects on photoaging or its tolerability. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the effects and tolerability of OA 0.5% to retinol 0.5% cream regarding visible signs of facial photoaging including facial wrinkles, fine lines and pigmentation. Methods: In this 12-week, double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 48 eligible participants were recruited and enroled from the Greater Sacramento region. The study consisted of a baseline and follow-up visits at weeks 4, 8 and 12. Participants were randomized to receive either topical OA 0.5% or retinol 0.5% for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was changes in the appearance of wrinkle severity at 12 weeks. Secondary outcome measures include changes in erythema, skin pigmentation, skin hydration and transepidermal water loss (TEWL). Results: OA improved wrinkle severity by 9.45% ( Conclusions: OA 0.5% is superior to retinol 0.5% in improving wrinkle severity and similar in improvement of pigment intensity. OA is better tolerated than retinol. Overall, the use of OA as a precursor to adapalene may be an effective method to improving the tolerability of retinoids while maintaining efficacy. Trial Registration: This study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05778760).

Identifiers

PMID39624736
PMCPMC11608876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.