ArticleJournal of caring sciences2024
Development of the Acute Coronary Syndrome Predictive Scale.
Article in Journal of caring sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translation, validation, predictive analysis of the Italian version of the McSweeney Acute and Prodromal Myocardial Infarction Symptom Survey and symptom cluster characterization in women.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The use of a predictive scale for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can play an essential role in screening high-risk individuals. This study aimed to develop the ACS predictive scale (ACS-PS) and investigate its construct validity, reliability, sensitivity and specificity. Methods: This was a retrospective methodological study with the aim of developing a predictive scale for ACS in Iran in 2019. In this study, the content validity (content validity index [CVI] and content validity ratio [CVR]), construct validity, sensitivity, specificity, cutoff point and internal consistency of the 13-item scale for predicting ACS (in Persian) were investigated. Participants included patients with a definite diagnosis of ACS (n=150) and a healthy group without ACS (n=143). Results: The score range of the 13-item scale was 0-130, and with a cutoff point of 11.5, both the sensitivity and specificity of the scale were 0.75. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.80. Conclusion: The present study introduced a sensitive and specific scale for predicting ACS. The ACS-PS is a partially short-form scale and requires less time to complete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.