Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39624512›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

A multidisciplinary weight management intervention for adults with severe mental illness in forensic psychiatric inpatient services (Motiv8): a single blind cluster-randomised wait-list controlled feasibility trial.

Rebekah Carney, Heather Law, Hany El-Metaal, Mark Hann, Gemma Shields, Siobhan Savage, Ingrid Small, Richard Jones, David Shiers, Gillian Macafee and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rebekah CarneyYouth Mental Health Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Heather LawYouth Mental Health Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Hany El-MetaalGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Mark HannDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research, and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Gemma ShieldsDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research, and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Siobhan SavageGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Ingrid SmallGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Richard JonesGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
David ShiersDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Gillian MacafeeYouth Mental Health Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Sophie ParkerYouth Mental Health Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People with severe mental illness experience physical health inequalities and a 15-20-year premature mortality rate. Forensic inpatients are particularly affected by restrictions on movement, long admissions, and obesogenic/sedative psychotropic medication. We aimed to establish the feasibility and acceptability of Motiv8, a multidisciplinary weight management intervention co-produced with service users for forensic inpatients. Methods: A randomised waitlist-controlled trial of Motiv8(+Treatment-As-Usual) vs.TAU was conducted in medium-secure forensic services in Greater Manchester. Motiv8 is a 9-week programme of exercise sessions, diet/cooking classes, psychology, physical health/sleep education, and peer support. Physical and mental health assessments were conducted at baseline/10-weeks/3-months. A nested qualitative study captured participant experiences. A staff sub-study explored ward environment. Results: We aimed to recruit 32 participants (four cohorts). The trial met recruitment targets (n=29, 90.9%; 4 cohorts, 100%), participants were randomised to Motiv8+TAU (n=12) or waitlist (control) (n=17). Acceptable retention rates were observed (93.1%, 10-weeks; 72.4%, 3-months), and participants engaged well with the intervention. The blind was maintained, and no safety concerns raised. Assessment completion was high suggesting acceptability (>90% for people retained and engaged in the study). Participants reported high levels of satisfaction. Conclusions: The trial was not powered to detect group differences. However, data suggests it is feasible to conduct a rigorous, methodologically robust study of Motiv8 vs.TAU for adults on forensic inpatient units. Motiv8 was acceptable with potential promise providing evidence to proceed to a definitive trial for males. A larger trial is needed to explore potential effectiveness and reduce physical health inequalities for people with SMI. Clinical trial registration: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN13539285, identifier ISRCTN13539285.

Indexed as

forensiclifestyle interventionmultidisciplinaryphysical healthrandomised controlled trialsecure services

Identifiers

PMID39624512
PMCPMC11609147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.