Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39624482›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in dementia2024

Environmental audit scoring evaluation: evolution of an evidence-based environmental assessment tool to support person-centered care.

Robert A Wrublowsky, Migette L Kaup, Margaret P Calkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in dementia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert A Wrublowsky *RAW Consultants, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Migette L Kaup *Department of Interior Architecture & Industrial Design, College of Architecture Planning and Design, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Margaret P Calkins *IDEAS Institute, Cleveland Heights, OH, United States.

Funding

Validation of The Environmental Audit Scoring Evaluation (EASE) ToolR21AG067010 · NIA · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KAUP, MIGETTE · 2020 to 2021
$318k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG067010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term care settings are at the center of strongly debated approaches to policies that shape the delivery of care and operational practices. There is advocacy for transformational change within these settings to support a person-centered approach to care delivery, but it is difficult and multifaceted involving everything from changing the level of staffing and care models to developing appropriate metrics to assess an individual's quality of life. The physical environment is a key component for accomplishing the organizational and operational goals related to person-centered care, but providers and their design teams need the appropriate tools to guide evidence-based decision-making. The Environmental Audit Scoring Evaluation (EASE) is a tool that helps lend structure to the process of developing the environment for our senior population-especially those living with dementia. This perspective article will discuss how EASE aims to align the design process to more fully support the myriad environmental elements that have a demonstrable impact on the individual, and the associated quality of life they experience. The article will also explore how EASE differs from previous planning strategies that did not prioritize residents' psychological wellbeing in conforming to current person-centered philosophies.

Indexed as

architectural designassisted livingdementiadesign guidelinesenvironmental assessmentlong term carenursing homesperson-centered care

Identifiers

PMID39624482
PMCPMC11609923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.